Surender Kumar Sharma vs State of H. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(HP) 180

RANJAN SHARMA
Surender Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General.

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents.

2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order(s) intended to be passed herein.

3. The petitioner, has filed the instant writ petition, with the following prayer(s):-

a) That a writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued and impugned order dated 26.2.2024 i.e. Annexure P-4 may kindly be quashed and set aside qua the petitioner, in view of the petitioner’s stay for about 11 months time (w.e.f 29.03.2023, Annexure P-2) at the present place of posting, when the private respondent has got 03 transfer orders in his favour within 01 years 05 months time, and also in view of medical ailments and continuous regular treatment of petitioner’s mother (aged about 85 years) of Solan/parwanoo, in the interest of law and justice.

b) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue as Assistant Engineer at HPPWD Sub-Division Solan, when he has not completed his normal tenure w.e.f. 29th March 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document