IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Subhash Chand – Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Others – Respondents
CWP No. 9717 of 2023
Decided On : 04-12-2023
Transfer Policy - Employee Transfer - The court stayed the transfer of the petitioner and allowed him to make a representation to the competent authority, directing the authority to examine the representation and pass appropriate orders within two weeks, in line with the law mandated by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Senior Assistant, challenged his transfer from District Rural Development Agency, Kinnaur to Development Block, Nankhari, District Shimla, on the grounds of violation of transfer policy and lack of public interest or administrative exigency.
Finding of the Court:
The court stayed the transfer and allowed the petitioner to make a representation to the competent authority, directing the authority to examine the representation and pass appropriate orders within two weeks, in line with the law mandated by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
Issues: Violation of transfer policy, lack of public interest or administrative exigency in the petitioner's transfer.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for an independent and impartial application of mind by the competent authority in examining the petitioner's representation, in line with the law mandated by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
Final Decision: The court stayed the transfer of the petitioner and allowed him to make a representation to the competent authority, directing the authority to examine the representation and pass appropriate orders within two weeks, in line with the law mandated by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
JUDGMENT :
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
1. Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2.
2. With the consent of the appearing parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the orders intended to be passed herein.
3. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayers:
(ii) That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to work as Senior Assistant in District Rural Development Agency, Kinnaur at Reckong Peo, District Kinnaur, H.P. or in the alternative, to adjust the petitioner in one of the stations as mentioned in Para 5 (h) supra, since the petitioner is presently serving in tribal/most difficult area and as per Clause 16.1 of the transfer policy, he is entitled to get station of his choice.”
4. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Clerk in the year 2001. He was promoted as Senior Assistant in April, 2022. Admittedly, the petitioner had served as Clerk and now as Senior Assistant at one place, i.e. Reckong Peo (the tribal area).
5. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that as per office order dated 28th November, 2023, Annexure P-1, he has been transferred as Senior Assistant, from District Rural Development Agency, Kinnaur to Development Block, Nankhari, District Shimla, against vacancy with immediate effect with TTA/Joining Time.
6. The petitioner has assailed this office order dated 28.11.2023, Annexure P-1, on the ground (i) that the transfer has been ordered on the basis of a D.O. Note No. 85344, dated 21.10.2023 in view of the averments made in Para-5(b) of the writ petition; (ii) the transfer is on the basis of a DO Note given by respondent No. 3, without there being any factual foundation or material, revealing public interest or administrative exigencies; (iii) the petitioner has highlighted the hardships, in Para-5 (c) of the writ petition.
7. Per contra, at this stage, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, submits that once the petitioner had been serving at the same station, i.e. Reckong Peo, since his initial posting and has completed more than twelve years at the present station, therefore, the petitioner has neither any fundamental nor any legal right to seek retention or posting at the same or convenient stations, suitable to him. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, submits that the transfer has been made just to fill-up a vacancy at the transferred station at Nankhari (Shimla).
8. Mr. Chaman Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that once the transfer has been made on the basis of extraneous consideration, without any foundation or material revealing public interest and administrative exigencies, therefore, the impugned transfer orders are ex-facie arbitrary, perverse, malafide and untenable in law.
9. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the entirety of facts and circumstances, this court may permit the petitioner to ventilate his claim, by way of a representation to the competent authority-respondent No. 2-Director, Rural Development Department, Himachal Pradesh, within ten days from today. The prayer bein
The need for an independent and impartial application of mind by the competent authority in examining the petitioner's representation, in line with the law mandated by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
The central legal point established is the requirement for fair and transparent application of Transfer Policy clauses to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination in employee transfers.
The Transfer Policy mandates that an employee who has already served in a difficult area should not be re-sent to such an area.
Mandatory and uniform application of Transfer Policy, fair and objective exercise of discretion in employee transfers.
An employee has the right to seek consideration and redressal from the appropriate authorities in case of hardships or adverse circumstances, and the court may permit the employee to make a represent....
Employees have the right to be considered for retention at the same station or convenient stations unless the transfer was ordered in public interest and administrative exigencies.
The transfer of an employee is within the prerogative power of the employer, who can withdraw, alter or modify any previous order of transfer. The court will not interfere under Article 226 of the Co....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.