Subhash Chand vs State of H. P. - 2023 Supreme(HP) 502

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(HP) 502

RANJAN SHARMA
Subhash Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Chaman Negi.
For the Respondent: Vishal Panwar.

JUDGMENT :

RANJAN SHARMA, J.

1. Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2.

2. With the consent of the appearing parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the orders intended to be passed herein.

3. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayers:

“(i) That writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued and the impugned office order dated 28.11.2023 (Annexure P-1), may kindly be quashed and set aside, since the same has been issued in gross and palpable violation of clause of clause 8 & 16.1 of the transfer policy framed by the State Government as well as on the basis of D.O. Note No. 85344 dated 21.10.2023 issued by Respondent No. 3, without there being any public interest or administrative exigency involved, with a view to unnecessary harass the petitioner without any lawful justification and to adjust/accommodate the near and dear to Respondent No. 3 at a later point of time after the transfer of the petitioner from the present place.

(ii) That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document