IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Galora Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. and others - Respondents
CWP No.9945 of 2023
Decided on : 15-12-2023
Transfer Policy - Employee Transfer - Clauses 12, 16.1 of Transfer Policy - Article 14 of the Constitution of India
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an Air Compressor Operator in the Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department, challenged his transfer from a tribal area to another location, citing violation of the Transfer Policy.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the petitioner to make a representation to the government authority, emphasizing the need for fair and transparent application of the Transfer Policy clauses to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination.
Issues: Violation of Transfer Policy, Right to Representation, Fair Application of Transfer Norms
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the government to adhere to the Transfer Policy clauses, consider employee options, and ensure fair and non-discriminatory application of transfer norms.
Final Decision: The transfer orders were stayed, and the petitioner was granted interim protection until the decision of the representation.
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order intended to be passed herein.
3. The petitioner has filed the instant petition with the following reliefs:-
(ii) That writ of mandamus may kindly be also issued, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to work at the present place of posting i.e. HP PWD Sub Division Holi under B&R Division HP PWD, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. and if necessitated, transfer the petitioner to the station of his choice after seeking the option of five stations of his choice as per the provision contained in Clause 16.1 of the transfer policy framed by the State Government vide Office Memorandum No.PER (AP-B)E (3)-17/2012, dated 10th July, 2013.”
4. The petitioner is Air Compressor Operator, working in Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department of the State Government. The petitioner initially joined as Beldar on daily wage basis in 1994. He was regularized in March,, 2007. On 01.09.2010, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Air Compressor Operator [Class-III] and was posted in Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department, Division Salooni, District Chamba, where he served for three years and seven months. Thereafter, he was transferred to Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department Division, Chamba, where he served for one and half years from 2015 onwards. The petitioner was transferred to Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department Division, Bharmour [Sub-Division Holi], which is a tribal area, in the year 2017, as per averments made in Para-2 of the writ petition.
5. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have issued an order dated 28.11.2023, Annexure P-1, transferring the petitioner from Sub-Division, Holi, under B&R Division, Bharmour to HPPWD Division Dalhousie, against vacancy, with TTA/JT.
6. The petitioner has assailed the impugned transfer orders dated 28.11.2023, Annexure P-1, on the ground, that the petitioner belongs to tribal area of Bharmour and he has completed the mandatory service of five years as per Clause 16.5, in the tribal area of Bharmour. Therefore, the petitioner has a right to be considered for posting from tribal area to any of the five stations choice, in terms of Clauses 12 and 16.1 of the Transfer Policy, but the impugned orders dated 28.11.2023, Annexure P-1, have been issued by ignoring the provisions which is alleged to be not in spirit of existing Policy and the law.
7. Per contra, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, submits that it was for the petitioner to submit a claim for posting in soft area and no claim was raised, then the impugned transfer orders were issued.
8. Be that as it may, once the State Authorities have issued the Transfer Policy, mandating certain concessions, to its employees, in view of Clauses 12 and 16.1 of the Transfer Policy, then, the aforesaid Clauses in the Transfer Policy, cannot be permitted to remain only on papers. In order to give effect to the aforesaid Clauses in the Transfer Policy, the respondents are bound to either call for an option from an employee or to prescribe a time-line when, such option(s) by way of representation, could be exercised by an employee, on completion of the normal tenure of two winters and three summers in such areas [for those who do not belong to such areas] and on completion of the normal tenure of five years in such areas [for those who belong to such areas as in this case]; and then to consider/examine the aforesaid option and to pass appropriate orders, in terms of Clauses 12 and 1
The central legal point established is the requirement for fair and transparent application of Transfer Policy clauses to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination in employee transfers.
The need for fair, objective, and transparent application of the Transfer Policy to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination in state action.
Mandatory and uniform application of Transfer Policy, fair and objective exercise of discretion in employee transfers.
The Transfer Policy mandates that an employee who has already served in a difficult area should not be re-sent to such an area.
The need for an independent and impartial application of mind by the competent authority in examining the petitioner's representation, in line with the law mandated by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for fair and equal treatment of employees, non-discrimination, and non-arbitrariness in state action as per Articles 14 and 16 of the C....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of fair and equal treatment in transfer and posting, as mandated by the Transfer Policy clauses 12, 15, and 16.1, to avoid prolonged....
The obligation of Administrative Authorities to consider and redress employee's hardships in accordance with the law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.