SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 553

RANJAN SHARMA
Galora Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ravi Chauhan

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Notice. Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order intended to be passed herein.

3. The petitioner has filed the instant petition with the following reliefs:-

    “(i) That writ of certiorari may kindly be issued, quashing and setting aside the impugned office order dated 28.11.2023 (Annexure P-1), since the same has been issued in violation of clause 8 and 16.1 of the transfer policy framed by the State Government.

(ii) That writ of mandamus may kindly be also issued, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to work at the present place of posting i.e. HP PWD Sub Division Holi under B&R Division HP PWD, Bharmour, District Chamba, H.P. and if necessitated, transfer the petitioner to the station of his choice after seeking the option of five stations of his choice as per the provision contained in Clause 16.1 of the transfer policy framed by the State Government vide Office Memorandum No.PER (AP-B)E (3)-17/2012, dated 10th July, 2013.”

4. The petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top