IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Surjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others – Respondents
CWP No. 1011 of 2024
Decided on : 13-02-2024
Transfer - Principal (School Cadre) - The court directed the respondent to consider and examine the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within a week, but not later than 22nd February, 2024. The court also directed the respondents not to compel the petitioner to join the transferred station until the decision of the representation.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Principal (School Cadre), challenged the notification of transfer and relieving orders on the grounds of incomplete tenure at the present station, entitlement to be considered for posting at a convenient station due to impending retirement, and transfer based on extraneous considerations.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondent to consider and examine the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within a week, but not later than 22nd February, 2024. The court also directed the respondents not to compel the petitioner to join the transferred station until the decision of the representation.
Issues: The issues involved the validity of the transfer and relieving orders in light of incomplete tenure, entitlement to a convenient station due to impending retirement, and alleged extraneous considerations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principles established in the cases of Shilpi Bose (Mrs.) and others versus State of Bihar and others, 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659 and State of U.P. and others versus Gobardhan Lal, (2004) 11 SCC 402, emphasizing the obligation of the respondents to consider and examine the petitioner's grievances and pass appropriate orders.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to consider and examine the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within a week, but not later than 22nd February, 2024. The court also directed the respondents not to compel the petitioner to join the transferred station until the decision of the representation.
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the peculiar facts as borne out from the pleadings.
3. The petitioner, a Principal (School Cadre) has filed, the instant writ petition, with the following prayer:-
4. The petitioner has assailed notification of transfer dated 24.01.2024 (Annexure P-1) transferring the petitioner, Principal (School Cadre) from GSSS Ganger, District Chamba to GSSS Bagthan, District Sirmour and relieving orders dated 03.02.2024 (Annexure P-2) on the grounds that (i) the petitioner has completed only one year and six months at present station; and (ii) petitioner is due for retirement within two years, on 31st July, 2025 and the petitioner is entitled to be considered for posting at convenient station in view of his retirement, when, this concession has been extended to other employees of the State Government, in view of the judgment, passed by Division Bench of this Court, in CWP No.1863 of 2018, titled as Rattan Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 24.10.2018, wherein, this Court has held that, the State Authorities cannot deprive the Class-I Officers for being considered for posting at convenient stations in view of their retirement within two years, when, the respondents have extended this concession to Class-I and other employees; and (iii) the transfer by ignoring the factum of couple case as his wife is serving as Language Teacher in District Chamba; and (iv) the transfer is not based on any cogent and convincing material revealing public interest and administrative exigencies and is alleged to be based on extraneous consideration.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has made a representation on 06.02.2024 (Annexure P-3), which is pending adjudication. However, as prayed for, this Court permits the petitioner to make a supplementary representation within three days from today to Principal Secretary (Education), to Government of Himachal Pradesh for ventilating his claims/grievances.
6. Per contra, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General submits that the notification of transfer dated 24.01.2024 (Annexure P-1), has been issued on administrative grounds.
7. Be that as it may, once the petitioner had made representation, on 06.02.2024 (Annexure P-3), highlighting ventilating his grievances, then, the respondents are bound to consider/examine the grievances and pass appropriate orders, in terms of the mandate of law in the case of Shilpi Bose (Mrs.) and others versus State of Bihar and others, 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659 and in the case of State of U.P. and others versus Gobardhan Lal, (2004) 11 SCC 402.
8. In the entirety, of the facts and circumstances, this Court, disposes of the present petition, by directing the respondent No.1 Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, to consider/examine the representation dated 06.02.2024 (Annexure P-3), and the supplementary representation to be filed within three days from today; and then, to pass appropriate orders in the matter within a week thereafter, but not later than 22nd February, 2024.
Till the decision of the representation, since the petitioner has already been relieved, thereafter, this Court is not inclined to stay the transfer orders dated 24.01.2024 (Annexure P-1) except than to direct the respondents not to compel the petitioner to join the transferred station GSSS Bagthan, District Sirmour.
Shilpi Bose (Mrs.) and others versus State of Bihar and others
The obligation of the respondents to consider and examine the petitioner's grievances and pass appropriate orders within a specified timeframe.
The Transfer Policy clauses must be followed in considering a teacher's transfer request.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Clause 16.2 of the transfer policy, which allows the petitioner to make a fresh representation indicating stations of choice and....
The court emphasized the importance of considering transfer requests in accordance with the specific clauses of the transfer policy and ensuring equal and non-discriminatory application of the policy....
The obligation of Administrative Authorities to consider and redress employee's hardships in accordance with the law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.