IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Vikas Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. and others - Respondents
CWP No.1070 of 2024
Decided on : 15-02-2024
Transfer Policy - Transfer of Class-I Officer - Clause 10 of the Transfer Policy - Clause 2.1 of the Transfer Policy - Recruitment and Promotion Rules - Administrative Authorities' consideration of employee's hardships
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Class-I Officer, challenged a transfer order from HP Police Training College to HP Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission, citing violation of Transfer Policy and natural justice.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the transfer order, stating that the petitioner cannot claim a right de-hors the existing Transfer Policy/Norms. The court also directed the Administrative Authority to consider the petitioner's representation regarding hardships within a week.
Issues: Violation of Transfer Policy, natural justice, and consideration of employee's hardships by Administrative Authorities.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the petitioner's claim should align with the existing Transfer Policy and norms. It also highlighted the obligation of Administrative Authorities to consider and redress employee's hardships.
Final Decision: The transfer order was upheld, and the Administrative Authority was directed to consider the petitioner's representation regarding hardships within a week.
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. Arsh Rattan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2.
2. With the consent of the appearing parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the orders intended to be passed herein.
3. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayers:-
(b) That if the respondent department finds unavoidable merit in adjustment of private respondent in District Kangra, the same may be ordered to be made against the officer having longer stay than the petitioner upholding the law of natural justice.
(c) That the respondents may kindly be directed to permit the petitioner to perform his duties at present place of posting i.e. HP Police Training College, Daroh till completion of normal tenure and as per the transfer policy. Alternatively, he may be ordered to be adjusted against the officer having longer tenure in District Kangra taking into consideration the previous postings of petitioner.”
4. The case of the petitioner in brief is that he is Assistant Controller in the Department of Himachal Pradesh Police Training College, Daroh. Admittedly, the petitioner is a Class-I Officer and the prescription of minimum tenure of three years as prescribed for other employees is not applicable to the Class-I Officer in terms of Clause 10 of the Transfer Policy.
5. The petitioner has assailed the Notification dated 29.01.2024 [Annexure P/1], transferring the petitioner from Police Training College, Daroh, District Kangra [H.P.] to H.P. Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission, Shimla, against a vacant post. In view of the provisions of Clause 10 of the Transfer Policy, as referred to above, this Court is not inclined to interfere, in the Notification dated 29.01.2024 [Annexure P/1], qua the petitioner, as the petitioner cannot claim a right, de-hors the existing Transfer Policy/Norms.
6. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on Clause 2.1 of the Transfer Policy in Para-6 of the writ petition, to gain strength that private respondent [Lata Mangesh] was promoted from the post of Section Officer to Assistant Controller and therefore, as per Clause 2.1 of the Transfer Policy, the aforesaid private respondent should have been adjusted against vacant post only. This plea of the petitioner is without merit, for the reason, that Clause 2.1 of the Transfer Policy permits the posting or promotion against a vacant post during the non-transfer period i.e., during the period of ban on general transfers. However, the transfer policy at the same time, enables the competent authority [Hon’ble Chief Minister], to relax any provision of the transfer policy, therefore, Learned State Counsel submits that the Notification dated 29.01.2024 [Annexure P/1] has been issued by relaxation and therefore, the challenge, by the petitioner, to the posting of private respondent is without force.
7. In addition to this, it is submitted that the post of Assistant Controller is a State Cadre Post. An Officer who is promoted to the post of Assistant Controller, under the Recruitment and Promotion Rules, issued under Article 309 of the Constitution of India, is liable to be posted anywhere throughout the State. In this background, the reliance on Clause 2.1 of the Transfer Policy, is of no assistance to the petitioner for the reason that the Rules conferring benefit of promotion, including the liability to be posted anywhere throughout the S
Shilpi Bose (Mrs.) and others versus State of Bihar and others
The obligation of Administrative Authorities to consider and redress employee's hardships in accordance with the law.
The central legal point established is the requirement for fair and transparent application of Transfer Policy clauses to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination in employee transfers.
The need for fair, objective, and transparent application of the Transfer Policy to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination in state action.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the transfer of police personnel must be based on genuine public interest and administrative exigencies, as required by Section 56 of the H....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for an independent and impartial application of mind by the State Police Establishment Committee in considering transfer orders,....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for an independent and impartial application of mind by the State Police Establishment Committee as per the provisions of Sectio....
The need for an independent and impartial application of mind by the competent authority in examining the petitioner's representation, in line with the law mandated by the Hon’ble Apex Court.
The Transfer Policy clauses must be followed in considering a teacher's transfer request.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.