Khem Chand vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(HP) 235

RANJAN SHARMA
Khem Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Surender Verma, Adv.
For the Respondent:Mr. Anup Rattan, Adv. General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General.

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents along with Mr. Anup Rattan, Learned Advocate General.

2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition, is taken up for disposal at this stage, in view of the orders, intended to be passed herein.

3. The petitioner, being a HHC, has come up before this Court, by way of the instant writ petition, seeking the following relief(s):-

(i) “That the appropriate writ, order and directions may kindly be issued thereby ordering and directing the respondents authorities not to give effect to the impugned transfer order dated 06.01.2024.

(ii) That appropriate writ, order and directions may kindly be issued quashing and setting aside the impugned transfer order dated 06.01.2024.

(iii) That the appropriate writ, order and directions may kindly be issued thereby ordering and directing the respondents authorities to allow the petitioner to continue at the present place of posting”.

4. Petitioner, Khem Chand was initially appointed as Constable in 3rd IRBn Battalion, Pandoh and he served at various places in Police Lines, District Mandi, S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document