Niranjan Kaur vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(HP) 270

RANJAN SHARMA
Niranjan Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mukul Sood.
For the Respondent: B.C. Verma.

Judgement Key Points

Please provide the content of the legal document (to replace {content} in the tag), along with your specific question or analysis request. I'll then extract key points with proper references (e.g., (!) (!) ).

JUDGMENT :

RANJAN SHARMA, J.

1. Notice. Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the peculiar facts as borne out from the pleadings.

3. The petitioner, a Trained Graduate Teacher (Non Medical), has come up, before this Court, by way of instant writ petition, seeking the following reliefs:

“(i) Issue a writ in nature of mandamus directing the respondent to transfer the petitioner from present place of posting which is a Tribal area to place of her choice in District Kangra in terms of the judgment of this Hon’ble Court dated 23.10.2018 in CWP No. 2114 of 2018 and judgment dated 24.12.2020 in CWP No. 5801 of 2020.

(ii) Issue a writ in nature of mandamus further directing the respondent to transfer and relieve the petitioner from present place of posting i.e. GHS Badgran District Chamba Tehsil Bharmour H.P. fortwith in relaxation to the condition of joining of the substitute in place of the petitioner.”

4. The petitioner is a Trained Graduate Teacher and posted at GHS Badgran (Bharmour), District Chamb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document