SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA 
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Prof. A.K. Mahajan - Appellant 
Versus
Central University and others - Respondents 
CWP No. 4187 of 2020
Decided on : 05-05-2025


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Mr. Shubham Singh Guleria and Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. Lokender Pal Thakur, Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
The seniority of professors promoted under the Career Advancement Scheme is determined by their date of eligibility as per the Selection Committee's recommendations, as governed by UGC Regulations.

Headnote:

(A) Central Universities Act, 2009 - Sections 27 and 28 - University Grants Commission Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers - Promotion under Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) - Seniority of CAS promotees determined from date of eligibility as per Selection Committee recommendations - Petitioner challenged seniority list placing respondent No.3 above him, arguing that CAS promotees should not outrank direct recruits. (Paras 10 , 12 , 18 , 21 )

(B) Promotion under CAS - The court held that the UGC Regulations and University Ordinances govern the seniority of promoted professors, affirming that the eligibility date for CAS promotions is critical for determining seniority. (Paras 18 , 21 )

Facts of the case:

The petitioner, a Professor at a Central University, contested his placement in the seniority list, arguing that a CAS promotee should not outrank a direct recruit. The respondent No.3 was promoted under CAS and placed above the petitioner in the seniority list.

Findings of Court:

The court found the seniority list issued by the University to be in accordance with UGC Regulations and the University's Ordinances.

Issues: The main issues were whether the seniority of CAS promotees should be determined from the date of eligibility and the validity of the seniority list issued by the University.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the UGC Regulations and University Ordinances clearly stipulate that seniority for CAS promotees is based on the date of eligibility as determined by the Selection Committee.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Petitioner, who is working as a Professor and Dean, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences in Central University of Himachal Pradesh (hereinafter, ‘University’), has filed the present petition praying for following main reliefs:

“i. That respondents may kindly be directed to issue a writ of certiorari to quash Annexure P-1 dated 15th September, 2020, whereby inter se seniority list of Professors has been issued and the petitioner is kept at Sr. No.2 instead of Sr. No.1.

ii. That the writ of mandamus may kindly be issued against the promoted Professors under CAS scheme and all promoted Professors should be treated as Additional Professors, but not as full-fledged Professor.

iii. Pay-scales of promoted Professors under CAS should be reduced.

iv. The respondent University may kindly be fined with heavy cost and the same may kindly be given to the present petitioner, as he has been put to unnecessarily litigation in the present case.”

2. The University, which has been established under the Central Universities Act, 2009, started functioning in January, 2010. University Grants Commission granted approval for running various academic programmes and also approved creation of various teaching positions vide letters dated 10.8.2010 (Annexure R-1) and 18.8.2010 (annexure R-2). Consequently, the University started process to fill up the posts through direct recruitment, on regular basis. In the interview held for the post of Professor, Department of Environment on 16.2.2012, one Dr. Tamizul Islam Khan Jamali was selected and petitioner was placed in waiting list (Annexure R-4). On 12.2.2012, Dr. Tamizul Islam Khan Jamali was repatriated to his parent Institution i.e. University of Rajasthan and petitioner was given appointment to the post of Professor, Department of Environment Science on 15.2.2013. He joined on 26.2.2013.

3. Simultaneously, in the interview for the post of Professor, Department of English held on 18.2.2012, respondent No.3 also appeared, but none was found suitable for appointment, however, he had also applied for the post of Associate Professor, Department of English, for which also interview was held on 18.2.2012, in which he was selected and he joined the University on 27.3.2012.

4. As per University, appointment of teachers and other academic staff in Universities is governed by the University Grants Commission Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education (hereinafter, ’Regulations’). Said Regulations, inter alia also provide for promotion under Career Advancement Scheme (in short, ‘CAS’). Ordinance 47 was framed to deal with promotion of University teachers under CAS strictly in accordance with Clause 6.4.0 of the Regulations. Clause 10.0 of Regulations and Clause 9 of Ordinance No. 47 provide for counting of past service for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS. Clause 10 of the Regulations reads as under:

“10.0 Counting of past services for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS.

10.1 Previous regular service, whether national or international, as Assistant Professor, Associate Professor or Professor or equivalent in a University, College, National Laboratories or other scientific/professional Organizations such as the CSIR, ICAR, DRDO, UGC, ICSSR, ICHR, ICMR, DBT etc. should be counted for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS of a teacher as Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, Professor or any other nomenclature these posts are described as per Appendix III- Table No. II provided that:

(a) The essential qualifications of the post held were not lower than the qualifications prescribed by the UGC for Assistant Professor, Associate Professor and Professor as the case may be.

(b) The post is/was in an equivalent grade or of the pre-revised scale of pay as the post of Assistant Professor (Lecturer) Associate Professor (Reader) and Profe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top