IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Prof. A.K. Mahajan - Appellant
Versus
Central University and others - Respondents
CWP No. 4187 of 2020
Decided on : 05-05-2025
(A) Central Universities Act, 2009 - Sections 27 and 28 - University Grants Commission Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers - Promotion under Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) - Seniority of CAS promotees determined from date of eligibility as per Selection Committee recommendations - Petitioner challenged seniority list placing respondent No.3 above him, arguing that CAS promotees should not outrank direct recruits. (Paras 10 , 12 , 18 , 21 )
(B) Promotion under CAS - The court held that the UGC Regulations and University Ordinances govern the seniority of promoted professors, affirming that the eligibility date for CAS promotions is critical for determining seniority. (Paras 18 , 21 )
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a Professor at a Central University, contested his placement in the seniority list, arguing that a CAS promotee should not outrank a direct recruit. The respondent No.3 was promoted under CAS and placed above the petitioner in the seniority list.
Findings of Court:
The court found the seniority list issued by the University to be in accordance with UGC Regulations and the University's Ordinances.
Issues: The main issues were whether the seniority of CAS promotees should be determined from the date of eligibility and the validity of the seniority list issued by the University.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the UGC Regulations and University Ordinances clearly stipulate that seniority for CAS promotees is based on the date of eligibility as determined by the Selection Committee.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Petitioner, who is working as a Professor and Dean, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences in Central University of Himachal Pradesh (hereinafter, ‘University’), has filed the present petition praying for following main reliefs:
“i. That respondents may kindly be directed to issue a writ of certiorari to quash Annexure P-1 dated 15th September, 2020, whereby inter se seniority list of Professors has been issued and the petitioner is kept at Sr. No.2 instead of Sr. No.1.
ii. That the writ of mandamus may kindly be issued against the promoted Professors under CAS scheme and all promoted Professors should be treated as Additional Professors, but not as full-fledged Professor.
iii. Pay-scales of promoted Professors under CAS should be reduced.
iv. The respondent University may kindly be fined with heavy cost and the same may kindly be given to the present petitioner, as he has been put to unnecessarily litigation in the present case.”
2. The University, which has been established under the Central Universities Act, 2009, started functioning in January, 2010. University Grants Commission granted approval for running various academic programmes and also approved creation of various teaching positions vide letters dated 10.8.2010 (Annexure R-1) and 18.8.2010 (annexure R-2). Consequently, the University started process to fill up the posts through direct recruitment, on regular basis. In the interview held for the post of Professor, Department of Environment on 16.2.2012, one Dr. Tamizul Islam Khan Jamali was selected and petitioner was placed in waiting list (Annexure R-4). On 12.2.2012, Dr. Tamizul Islam Khan Jamali was repatriated to his parent Institution i.e. University of Rajasthan and petitioner was given appointment to the post of Professor, Department of Environment Science on 15.2.2013. He joined on 26.2.2013.
3. Simultaneously, in the interview for the post of Professor, Department of English held on 18.2.2012, respondent No.3 also appeared, but none was found suitable for appointment, however, he had also applied for the post of Associate Professor, Department of English, for which also interview was held on 18.2.2012, in which he was selected and he joined the University on 27.3.2012.
4. As per University, appointment of teachers and other academic staff in Universities is governed by the University Grants Commission Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education (hereinafter, ’Regulations’). Said Regulations, inter alia also provide for promotion under Career Advancement Scheme (in short, ‘CAS’). Ordinance 47 was framed to deal with promotion of University teachers under CAS strictly in accordance with Clause 6.4.0 of the Regulations. Clause 10.0 of Regulations and Clause 9 of Ordinance No. 47 provide for counting of past service for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS. Clause 10 of the Regulations reads as under:
“10.0 Counting of past services for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS.
10.1 Previous regular service, whether national or international, as Assistant Professor, Associate Professor or Professor or equivalent in a University, College, National Laboratories or other scientific/professional Organizations such as the CSIR, ICAR, DRDO, UGC, ICSSR, ICHR, ICMR, DBT etc. should be counted for direct recruitment and promotion under CAS of a teacher as Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, Professor or any other nomenclature these posts are described as per Appendix III- Table No. II provided that:
(a) The essential qualifications of the post held were not lower than the qualifications prescribed by the UGC for Assistant Professor, Associate Professor and Professor as the case may be.
(b) The post is/was in an equivalent grade or of the pre-revised scale of pay as the post of Assistant Professor (Lecturer) Associate Professor (Reader) and Profe
The seniority of professors promoted under the Career Advancement Scheme is determined by their date of eligibility as per the Selection Committee's recommendations, as governed by UGC Regulations.
The court affirmed the necessity for universities to adhere to UGC regulations for promotions and re-employment, emphasizing timely action and the eligibility of superannuated teachers under the Care....
Past services of a professor can be counted for promotion under UGC regulations, regardless of whether the previous pay scale was higher than UGC standards.
The U.G.C. Regulations, 2018 prevail over U.G.C. guidelines, and the Vice Chancellor could have exercised power under Section 7-C(5) to address the situation.
Past service in temporary roles can be counted for promotion under Career Advancement Scheme, aligning with UGC regulations; denial of such benefits violates legal rights.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the 2010 Regulations provide for the counting of previous regular service for the purposes of grant of benefits under CAS, without making a....
Past services in private institutions must be counted for Career Advancement Scheme eligibility, and subsequent Executive Councils cannot revoke earlier decisions without lawful basis.
Eligibility for promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme requires active service status on the date of consideration, as per UGC Regulations.
The main legal principle established is that UGC Regulations, 2010 have prospective effect and candidates who fulfill eligibility criteria before the enforcement of the regulations can be considered ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.