IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
Vinod Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. - Respondents
CWP No. 11854 of 2024
Decided On : 21-03-2025
(A) Ex-Servicemen Reservation of Vacancies in Himachal Pradesh Technical Services Rules, 1985 - Clause 18.4.9 - Petitioner, an ex-serviceman, employed as Junior Engineer (Civil) on contract basis, sought nomination for a similar post in Jal Shakti Department - Respondents denied nomination citing that the post is not higher - Court held that the petitioner can seek nomination as the post is not regular civil employment and the rules allow for such consideration. (Paras 3, 4, 5)
(B) Employment on Contract Basis - Clarification regarding civil employment - Employment on contract basis does not constitute civil employment, allowing ex-servicemen to seek further nominations for reserved posts. (Paras 4(iii)(a), 4(iv))
(C) Interpretation of 'Higher Post' - The term 'higher post' is not strictly defined and can encompass better career prospects and status, not just rank or pay scale. (Paras 4(iii)(c), 4(iii)(d))
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an ex-serviceman, is currently serving as Junior Engineer (Civil) in HIMUDA on a contract basis and sought nomination for a similar post in the Jal Shakti Department, which was denied by the respondents.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner has the right to seek nomination for the post in Jal Shakti Department as the current position does not constitute civil employment and the rules permit such applications.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner could seek nomination for a similar post despite currently holding a contract position.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner, being on a contract basis, is not in civil employment and thus can seek nomination for another post reserved for ex-servicemen, as per the applicable rules.
Result: Writ petition allowed; respondents directed to nominate the petitioner for the post.
JUDGMENT :
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Petitioner is an ex-serviceman, presently serving as Junior Engineer (Civil) on Contract basis in Himachal Urban Development Authority (HIMUDA), where he had joined through the agency of Ex-servicemen Cell-respondents No.2 & 3 in December 2023. In the year 2024, several vacancies in different departments of the State meant to be filled up from ex-servicemen were notified. These were to be filled up through the Ex-servicemen Cell-respondents No.2 & 3. Petitioner was interested for the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) in Jal Shakti Department, Shimla notified at Serial No.74 & 75 of Annexure P-2. He, accordingly, represented on 10.09.2024 (Annexure P-1) to respondents No.2 & 3 to sponsor his name & to allow him to participate in the Screening process for the aforesaid post. Respondents No.2 & 3 did not oblige, hence, this writ petition.
2. Submissions
2(i) Learned Advocate General and learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 contend that having once been employed on a civil post as an ex-serviceman through respondents No.2 & 3, the petitioner can seek appointment against another civil post as an ex-serviceman only if the other is a post higher to the post currently held by the petitioner. The petitioner is presently serving as Junior Engineer (Civil) in HIMUDA on contract basis. He is now seeking employment again as Junior Engineer (Civil) in Jal Shakti Department of the State. Junior Engineer (Civil) in Jal Shakti Department is not a post higher to the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) HIMUDA. The post remains the same i.e. Junior Engineer (Civil). Therefore, petitioner’s name had rightly not been sponsored by respondents No.2 & 3 for the post in question. In support of this submission, reliance was placed upon following contents of an office letter dated 21.02.2009 (Annexure R-1):-
“Dated Shimla-171002, the 21st February, 2009
From
The Secretary (Personnel) to the
Government of Himachal Pradesh
To
The Director
Sainik Welfare Department
H.P. at Hamirpur, 177001.
Subject:- Clarification with regard to considering the Ex-servicemen already nominated/appointed on contract basis for higher job on contract bases again.
I am directed to refer to your letter No. DSW-EMP (Ex-cell) 4/76 dated 10th October, 2008 and subsequent reminder of even number dated 5-11-2008 on the above subject and and to say that employment on contract basis is not to be termed as civil employment. The first civil employment would mean that employment which is regular and where the official is given the benefit of reservation as ex-servicemen.
Keeping in view the above position, the ex-servicemen once nominated/appointed on contractual basis can be considered again against higher post against a vacancy reserved for ex-servicemen on the basis of their seniority in the "Live Register' till they are appointed on regular basis.
Yours Faithfully
Deputy Secretary (Personnel) to
the Government of Himachal Pradesh”
2(ii) Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that petitioner is serving at present as Junior Engineer (Civil) in HIMUDA through respondents No.2 & 3. The post is not regular but on contractual basis and further the post is not under the State Government but under HIMUDA-an independent authority. In order to have better career prospects, petitioner aspires for consideration of his candidature against vacancies for ex-servicemen which have now arisen in the State departments. Referring to Chapter 18 of the Handbook on Personnel Matters Volume-I (Edition 2021), the Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (Reservation of vacancies in Himachal State Non-Technical Services) Rules 1972 and the Ex-Servicemen Reservation of vacancies in the Himachal Pradesh Technical Services) Rules 1985, learned counsel contended that there is no provision under the applicable rules/instructions which prohibits consideration of petitioner’s candidature as an ex-serviceman against a civil post on account of his presently manning a civil post on contract basis through respond
An ex-serviceman on contract can seek nomination for another post reserved for ex-servicemen, as current employment does not constitute civil employment under applicable rules.
Proper adherence to ex-servicemen reservation criteria is crucial in public sector appointments, with the potential for supernumerary posts to accommodate deserving candidates.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the eligibility criteria for ex-servicemen under the Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Rules, 2005 and the inapplicability of the Ex-Servicemen (Re-emplo....
Similarly situated ex-servicemen from same nomination lists entitled to parity in retrospective regular appointment as per requisition and government timelines, quashing discriminatory prospective re....
Ex-servicemen can pursue multiple claims for recruitment based on applications made prior to any recruitment, despite subsequent appointments, aligning eligibility assessments with the date of applic....
Eligibility for ex-servicemen’s concessions must be assessed at the application date, not recruitment date; subsequent recruitment does not negate pre-existing claims.
The interpretation of the proviso to Rule 2(2A) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Absorption of Ex-Servicemen) Rules, 1988, regarding the eligibility of Ex-Servicemen for recruitment benefits.
Point of Law : Court find that no Question of Law, muchless Substantial Question of Law, is made out for admission and adjudication of the appeal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.