IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
Shubham Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
1. Petitioner Shubham Sharma has filed the present petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Cr. P.C.) for quashing of FIR No. 74 of 2022, dated 4.5.2022, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the FIR in question’), registered under Sections 498A, 323, 406, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC’), with Police Station, Amb, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P., as well as, the proceedings resultant thereto, stated to be pending before the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Amb, District Una, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’).
2. The petitioner has filed the petition on the ground that his elder brother, namely, Ankush Sharma was married to respondent No. 2, in the year 2018. As per the petitioner, respondent No. 2, for the reasons best known to her, lodged FIR in question, in which, Police has conducted the investigation and submitted chargesheet, against the petitioner, as well as, his brother and parents. There are total four accused in the case, pending adjudication, before the learned trial Court.
3. According
Payal Sharma vs. State of Punjab & Anr.
A petitioner can seek to quash an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if the allegations do not specifically implicate them, thus preventing abuse of judicial process.
The High Court can quash FIRs against individuals named in dowry harassment cases when allegations are general, vague, and lack specificity, preventing abuse of the legal process.
In domestic violence cases, general and vague allegations are insufficient; specific instances must be provided to avoid misuse of legal provisions.
Vague and general allegations in domestic violence cases are insufficient for prosecution; specific instances must be provided to avoid misuse of legal provisions.
Vague and omnibus allegations in FIR do not constitute a cognizable offence; however, if allegations disclose prima facie commission of offences, FIR cannot be quashed.
There is no prohibition against quashing of criminal proceedings even after charge-sheet has been filed.
The High Court cannot quash an FIR unless the allegations do not constitute an offence; the judiciary must respect the trial process and not supplant it with its judgment on the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.