SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1072

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA 
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.
Room Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.M.P.(M) No. 1787 of 2024
Decided On : 10-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Alok Ranjan.
For the Respondent:Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.

The court ruled that strong evidence existed against the accused for serious crimes, and health concerns and trial delays did not justify bail.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 - Section 483 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 302, 307, 323, 325, 326, 201, 147, 148, 149, 440, 354, 354-B, 109, and 34 - Arms Act - Section 25 - SC&ST Act - Sections 3(1)(r), (s), (w) & 3 (2)(va) - Petition for bail based primarily on health grounds and delay in trial - Court found serious criminal allegations against the petitioner, thus no prima facie case for bail established. (Paras 1, 3, 40)

(B) Bail - Considerations for granting bail - Court must evaluate prima facie evidence; mere claims of health issues and delays in trial insufficient to grant bail where serious charges exist against the accused. (Paras 40)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed for bail after being accused of serious offenses including murder and assault following a violent incident involving multiple victims. Key health concerns were cited, along with delays in the trial process attributed to the complainant's non-appearance. (Paras 1-4)

Findings of Court:
The evidence suggested involvement in a planned assault, with serious injuries sustained by victims. There is no medical urgency established for granting bail. (Paras 22, 40)

Issues: The primary considerations were the seriousness of the charges against the petitioner, the evidence indicating involvement, and the validity of health claims.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the evidence indicated a clear prima facie case against the petitioner, thus denying bail despite health concerns and delays in trial.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for bail based on health and delay. (Para 1 , 5 , 8 , 9)
2. bail petition filed under bnss due to health conditions. (Para 2)
3. details of the incident and charges. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 11)
4. defense arguments aiming to establish non-involvement. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. health conditions of the petitioner and implications. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
6. arguments highlighting insufficient evidence supporting the petitioner's involvement. (Para 19)
7. state's stance on petitioner's health and trial delay. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
8. timeline and procedural history of trial. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 29)
9. legal precedents and implications of trial delays. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
10. evidential burden and serious nature of charges. (Para 35 , 36 , 37)
11. court's observations on defense's conduct. (Para 39 , 40 , 41)
12. final dismissal of the bail application. (Para 43)

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.

Petitioner has approached this Court under Section483 Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (in short ‘ BNSS ’) seeking bail in case FIR No. 239 of 2021, dated 26.8.2021, registered in Police Station Kullu, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, under Sections 302 , 307, 323, 325, 326, 201, 147, 148, 149, 440, 354, 354-B, 109 and 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short ‘IPC’), Section 25 of ARMS ACT and Sections 3(1)(r), (s), (w) & 3 (2)(va) of Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (herein after referred to as SC&ST Act).

2. On behalf of the petitioner, apart from the prayer for enlarging the petitioner on regular bail, prayer for interim bail for5-6 months on health grounds has also been made.

3. Prayer for interim bail has been made in this petition mainly on the grounds of health condition of the petitioner as well as delay in progress of trial for non-appearance/examination of the complainant during past one year, and there is no evidence on record regarding involvement of the petitioner in commission of the offence.

4. Status Report stands filed. Record was also made available.

5. Prosecution case is that on 25.8.2021 at about 7:30 P.M. an information was received in Police Station, Kullu that at near Saeubag at Chhururu, some mishap had occurred. This information was transmitted by Police Station staff to QRT team and to SI Kushal Kumar, the then SHO, who was on patrolling. SI Kushal Kumar, out of his Patrolling Party, deputed ASI Vij Ram and Constable Om Parkash to reach Regional Hospital, Kullu to handle the situation on arrival of injured and alongwith remaining team of Patrolling Party he rushed to spot. On reaching near Café Water Edge (hereinafter referred as Café) at Chhururu, he met Constables of QRT Team of Kullu Police who were controlling the traffic on the spot, managing preservation of the spot and were waiting for Ambulance to shift injured persons from spot. Son of victim Yuma Devi and other onlookers were also present on the spot. Paras Ram was lying in katcha portion of road on side of road. He was bleeding badly and at some distance from him, in the middle of the road, his broken vehicle was there. On left front seat thereof injured Yuma Devi was crying due to pains. SI Kushal Kumar instead of waiting for Ambulance directed QRT Team and son of victim to shift injured to the Hospital in his Police vehicle. Thereafter on reaching the Hospital, treatment of injured was started in emergency. During treatment, statement of Yuma Devi was recorded under Section 154 Cr.P.C. by ASI Vij Ram, on the basis of which FIR was registered under Sections 307 , 320, 147, 148, 149 IPC, Section 25 of ARMS ACT and Section 3 of Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

6. Keeping in view serious condition of victims during night, they were referred to Medical College and Hospital, Nerchowk, Mandi. As provisions of SC&ST Act were attracted, therefore, in compliance of communication dated 26.8.2021 issued by Superintendent of Police, Kullu, investigation was transferred

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top