IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Sagar Srivastava - Applicant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
CrMP (M) No. 78 of 2025
Decided On : 10-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail due to apprehension of arrest. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicant alleges false registration of fir. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of alleged fraudulent acts by respondents. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. investigation findings on the alleged forgery. (Para 13) |
| 5. court's decision on bail application and trial considerations. (Para 14 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. assessment of evidence and allegations against applicant. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
| 7. confirmation of interim bail order with conditions. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Apprehending his arrest, in case FIR No.22 of2024 dated 12th July, 2024, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘FIR in question’), registered under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereinafterreferred to as ‘IPC’), with Police Station New Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., the applicant has filed the present application, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ BNSS ’).
2. By way of the present application, the applicant has sought the indulgence of this Court to direct the I.O/police of Police Station New Shimla, to release him, on bail, in the event of his arrest, in the above-mentioned case/FIR.
3. According to the applicant, he is having deep roots in the society and FIR in question has falsely been registered against him by the police.
4. It is the case of the applicant that he was posted as Manager in the H.P. Gramin Bank. According to him, FIR, in question, has been lodged, due to non-payment of Rs.8,00,000/- by the borrower and the guarantor, who had obtained KCC loan of Rs.8,00,000/-, in the year 2017, on the basis of forged and fake documents.
5. According to the applicant, he, in the capacity of Manager, has sanctioned the loan, without there being any knowledge that the documents, which had been submitted, when processed, were fake and fabricated and as such, he has nothing to do with the offence.
6. Certain undertakings have been given on behalf of the applicant, for which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case, any direction is issued to the police/I.O., in this case.
7. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report disclosing therein, that on 12th July, 2024, a copy of order, passed under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CrPC’), was received from the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.III, Shimla, along with the complaint, moved by Virender Kumar Chauhan, who is the Manager of Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank, Khalini, Shimla.
8. In the said complaint, the following facts have been mentioned:
“That the complainant Bank is a Body Corporate Constituted under Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of undertaking) Act No. 5, 1970 having its Head Office at Jail Road District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh and amongst other Branch Offices, a Branch at Khalini, District Shimla in the State of Himachal Pradesh. 2. That Virender Kumar Chauhan of the complainant Bank who has signed this complaint is the Principal Officer/Branch Manager/Assistant General Manager of the Bank. He is constituted Attorney of the Complainant Bank and as such is competent to sign the proceedings, affidavit, Vakalatnama to engage advocate and is empowered to institute the complaint and as such the present complaint is instituted by Sh. Virender Kumar Chauhan who is presently posted as Regional Manager District Hamirpur (HP) and the present complaint instituted on the basis of information derived from the records of the plaintiff Bank. A copy of the Power of Attorney is filed herewith. 3. That the respondent No. 1 approached to the complainant Bank on dated 20.03.2017 and requested the complainant Bank to grant a KCC loan of Rs 8,00,000/- for agriculture produce and the respondent has also submitted his loan application along with revenue papers (Jamabandi). On perusal of the loan application, the complainant bank has agreed to grant a KCC Lim
The court emphasized that interim bail is necessary to avoid pre-trial punishment and that the applicant's involvement in alleged fraud will be assessed during trial proceedings.
The court affirmed that denying bail constitutes pre-trial punishment and noted the necessity for evidence to substantiate allegations of fraud in loan acquisition.
The court granted bail based on the prolonged custody of the petitioner and the nature of evidence being documentary, mitigating the risk of tampering.
Anticipatory bail granted under BNSS Section 482 as no case for custodial interrogation made out; applicant cooperated in investigation without need to confess, police holds full record.
The court ruled that a bail application should be denied where serious allegations of economic fraud exist, especially when the applicant is a habitual offender and poses a risk of tampering with evi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering the nature and gravity of the accusation, the character and behavior of the accused, and the likelihood of the offens....
The prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the offences of conspiracy and forgery against the appellants, with mere suspicion not serving as a substitute for valid evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.