Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Saket Grover – Appellant
Versus
Hemant Grover – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition details and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims regarding the property ownership and suit. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. contentions on procedural lapses and evidence. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 20) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments highlight the necessity and appropriateness of the amendment. (Para 31) |
| 5. analysis of revisional jurisdiction under section 115. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 52) |
| 6. finding principles relevant to amendments and keeping justice. (Para 59 , 64 , 75) |
| 7. court's revisional jurisdiction assessed based on procedural correctness and focus on substantive justice. (Para 70) |
| 8. final decision to allow the amendment strengthens the pursuit of justice. (Para 114) |
| 9. conclusion regarding the maintainability of the petition. (Para 116 , 119 , 120) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
1. The instant petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (hereinafter "CPC") read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
"(i) accept the civil revision petition of the petitioner;
(ii) set-aside and quash the order dated 17.10.2022 passed by the Ld. Trial Court on the applicatio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
