Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,J, SUSHIL KUKREJA,J
Rajesh Kumar @ Lachhu – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sushil Kukreja, J.
1. Since all these appeals are the offshoots of impugned judgment dated 25.02.2020 and order of sentence dated 04.03.2020, rendered by learned Special Judge Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Trial Court”), in Sessions Case No. 12-G/VII/2015, they are being taken up together for disposal.
2. The instant appeals have been preferred by the appellants/accused persons/convicts under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned judgment of conviction, dated 25.02.2020, and order of sentence dated 04.03.2020, passed by the learned Trial Court, in Sessions Case No. 12-G/VII/2015, whereby accused persons viz., Rajneesh, Rajesh and Ramesh were convicted and sentenced as under: Convict Rajneesh Sr. No. Offence under Fine In
default of
| Sr. No. | Offence under section | Sentence | Fine | In default of payment of fine |
| 1. | 363 IPC | Rigorous imprisonment (RI) for five years | Rs.5000/- | Simple imprisonment (SI) for three months |
| 2. | 366/120B IPC | RI for ten years | Rs.10,000/- | SI for six months |
| 3. | 4 of POCSO Act | RI for fifteen years | Rs.10,000/- | SI for six months |
| 4. | 3(1)(xii) of ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 | RI for two years | Rs. | |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
