IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, RANJAN SHARMA, JJ.
Nehru Yuva Club of Village Manlog-Badog and Another – Appellants
Versus
State of H.P. and Others – Respondents
C.W.P. No. 1791 of 2026
Decided On : 10-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge village's panchayat inclusion despite objections (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. court proceedings clarify distances and objections (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. reorganization followed statutory process, prior resolutions (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. outdated resolutions, misrepresented distances, population irrelevant (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. challenge reorganization before delimitation finalizes (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. judicial review permitted for arbitrary delimitation (Para 33 , 34) |
| 7. reorganization arbitrary ignoring contiguity, distance, population (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. quash notification, direct fresh delimitation (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT :
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.
1. Petitioners, namely Nehru Yuva Club of Village Manlog-Badog and Mahila Mandal of Village Manlog-Badog, have preferred present petition against inclusion of Village Manlog Badog in Gram Panchayat Darlaghat, District Solan, after exclusion of the said village from Gram Panchayat Hanuman Badog vide notification dated 27.01.2026 (Annexure P-3).
2. It is the case of the petitioners that, by issuing notification dated 18.12.2025, proposing reorganization/merger of Panchayats, objections and suggestions from the residents of the concerned Gram Panchayats were invited, authorizing Deputy Commissioner, Solan to receive objections and suggestions from the public and to submit final recommendations after considering the same. The proposal for inclusion of Village Manlog Badog in Gram Panchayat Darlaghat after exclusion of the same from Gram Panchayat Hanuman Badog was opposed by the residents of Manlog Badog by submitting objections dated 30.12.2025 on 31.12.2025 to the Additional District Magistrate, Solan, with copies thereof to the District Panchayat Adhikari and Deputy Commissioner, Solan, stating that few years ago, such proposal had been accepted by some villagers, but the present scenario is completely different and most of the villagers are not interested in inclusion of Manlog Badog in Gram Panchayat Darlaghat, as relations and day-to-day business of residents of Village Manlog Badog are interwoven with residents of Village Hanuman Badog, as both villages are contiguous. Attention of the authorities was also invited to the application submitted by residents of Gram Panchayat Darlaghat opposing the inclusion of Manlog Badog in Gram Panchayat Darlaghat.
3. Nothing was heard with respect to the aforesaid objections. Instead, the respondents issued impugned notification dated 27.01.2026 (Annexure P-3), notifying inclusion of Village Manlog Badog in Gram Panchayat Darlaghat after its exclusion from Gram Panchayat Hanuman Badog.
4. Immediately after issuance of the notification dated 27.01.2026, residents of Manlog Badog contacted Up-Pardhan of Gram Panchayat Hanuman Badog, who issued certificate/communication dated 28.01.2026 (Annexure P-4), highlighting that day-to-day affairs of the residents of Village Manlog Badog were connected with residents of Village Hanuman Badog. It was further stated that Gram Panchayat Hanuman Badog was about 2-3 km from Village Manlog Badog, whereas Gram Panchayat Darlaghat was located about 6-7 km away. Therefore, request was made to keep Village Manlog Badog in Gram Panchayat Hanuman Badog.
5. Thereafter, Authorized Officer-cum-Block Development Officer, Kunihar, District Solan, issued notification dated 02.02.2026 (Annexure P-5) notifying determination/delimitation of seats of Gram Panchayats Sehrol, Badog, Hanuman Badog and Darlaghat situated in Development Block Kunihar and inviting objections from the public regarding delimitation proposal of constituencies and wards within one week from the date of publication of the notice.
6. On 03.02.2026, residents of Village Manlog Badog submitted their objections on the same lines as were submitted earlier against notification of reorganization/merger dated 18.12.2025.
7. Resolutions au
Kishorchandra Chhhanganlal Rathod vs. Union of India & Ors.
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) vs. Secretary, Governor’s Secretariat & Ors.
AI
Panchayat reorganization must consider actual contiguity, distance, population; arbitrary decisions based on wrong facts/misrepresented distances are amenable to judicial review and liable to be quas....
The court held that notifications for delimitation of Gram Panchayats are administrative acts not subject to judicial review unless proven arbitrary, and non-adherence to internal guidelines does not....
Delimitation after panchayat reorganization mandates strict adherence to 7-day objection and appeal timelines; curtailment to 3 days and rushed processes invalid; conduct elections using prior valid ....
Limited scope of judicial review in administrative actions and impermissibility of interference in electoral matters after the commencement of the election process
The main legal point established in the judgment is that if objections were invited, raised, and rejected by the relevant authority, the court cannot entertain the challenge to the delimitation of Pa....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.