IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
State of H.P. – Appellant
Versus
Dhruv Dev – Respondent
The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25.8.2014, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palampur, District Kangra, HP (learned Trial Court), vide which the respondent (accused before the learned Trial Court) was acquitted of the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the IPC. It was asserted that informant Sada Nand (PW2) was returning to his home on a motorcycle bearing Registration No. HP-37B-2988, which was being driven by Banti @ Vivek Kumar (PW3). A car bearing the registration no. HP-39B-2236 overtook another car near Dairy Farm and hit the Motorcycle. The informant Sada Nanad (PW2) and Vivek Kumar (PW3) sustained injuries. Baldev Singh (PW5) took the injured to the Hospital. The accident occurred d
Surendra Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
Thoti Manohar vs State of Andhra Pradesh
M Nageswara Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdev Singh
Ramnaresh v. State of Chhattisgarh
In acquittal appeals for rash driving, reversal warranted if trial view perverse ignoring objective evidence like site plans, photos showing wrong-side driving, reliable related witnesses, and accuse....
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving resulting in death, emphasizing the reliability of eyewitness testimony and the inapplicability of probation for serious traffic offences.
In acquittal appeals, no interference unless perverse; 'high speed' without quantification or collision corroboration fails to prove rash/negligent driving; trial court's reasonable view upheld.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the failure to prove the identity of the driver led to the acquittal of the accused, but the appeal allowed and the accused was convicted for ....
The court affirmed that driving under the influence of alcohol constitutes negligence under the Motor Vehicles Act, supporting conviction despite minor discrepancies in witness statements.
Revisional jurisdiction limited; cannot reappreciate evidence without perversity. Overtaking motorcycle on curve amid oncoming traffic is rash negligence under IPC Sections 279/337; probation inappli....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.