SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 391

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Sh. Yadwinder Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. MP (M) No.111 of 2026
Decided On : 28-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General.

Cough syrup with Codeine Phosphate below 2.5% concentration, compounded and established in therapeutic practice, excluded from 'manufactured drug' under NDPS Act notification; bail granted post-challan pending trial proof.

Headnote:(A) ND & PS Act, 1985 - Sections 2(xi), 2(xiv), 8(c), 22, 37, 80 - Notification S.O. 826(E) dated 14.11.1985 Entry 35 - Cough syrup containing Codeine Phosphate, if compounded with other ingredients, containing not more than 100 mg per dosage unit, concentration not more than 2.5% in undivided preparations and established in therapeutic practice, excluded from “manufactured drug” definition - Not narcotic drug under Act if FSL report shows less than 2.5% concentration - Recovery not attracting NDPS rigours without proof of exceeding limits - Issue for trial determination - Post-challan bail granted on presumption of innocence, period of incarceration. (Paras 3,5-9)

(B) Bail - Principles - Grant general rule, denial exception - Consider participation in investigation, no pending recovery, nature of accusation, gravity balanced with humane approach, overcrowding in prisons - Not punitive, secure trial attendance. (Paras 9-13)

Facts of the case:
Vehicle stopped during traffic check, search yielded bag with 10 bottles of cough syrup (one empty, nine containing 10 ml each) marked as containing Triprolidine Hydrochloride & Codeine Phosphate. No explanation for possession. FIR registered, arrest followed, challan filed, nothing to recover.

Findings of Court:
Petition allowed, enlarged on bail subject to personal bond of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties, conditions including attendance at trial, no tampering, no inducement, no leaving territory without permission, surrender passport if any. Liberty misuse allows cancellation.

Issues: Whether cough syrup qualifies as manufactured/narcotic drug under NDPS given concentration below 2.5%; satisfaction of notification twin conditions; applicability of Section 37; post-challan bail entitlement considering gravity and profession.

Ratio Decidendi: FSL report indicates Codeine Phosphate below 0.2%, silent on exceeding 2.5% or therapeutic establishment - falls under exception per notification and communications; not proven manufactured drug, NDPS not applicable; presumption of innocence till guilt proved, sufficient suffering, no reason for prolonged incarceration pending trial.

Result: Bail petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. arrest for possessing codeine cough syrup during check. (Para 1 , 2)
2. low codeine syrup exempt from ndps manufactured drug. (Para 3)
3. therapeutic proof and bulk quantity invoke ndps rigours. (Para 4)
4. entry 35 notification excludes low-concentration codeine preparations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
5. ndps applicability doubtful; merits for trial court. (Para 8)
6. bail rule under innocence presumption and balance factors. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
7. bail granted with conditions; observations limited to bail. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Bail petitioner namely Yadwinder Singh, who is behind bars since 07.10.2025, has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.229 of 2025, dated 07.10.2025, under Section 22 of ND & PS Act, registered at Police Station Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

2. Respondent-State has filed status report, perusal whereof reveals that on 07.10.2025 at about 06:10 p.m, while Police party was present near the IPH office, Paonta Sahib, a car bearing registration No.HP-71-6317, being driven by the bail-petitioner, was stopped for traffic checking. Since driver of the car i.e. bail-petitioner got perplexed and started making excuses, Police deemed it necessary to conduct search of the vehicle as well as above named person. Allegedly, after having associated the independent witnesses, Police conducted search of the car and found one bag containing 10 bottles of Cough Syrup marked “Lykarex-T Cough Syrup” (100 ml), containing Triprolidine Hydrochloride & Codeine Phosphate Syrup. Out of aforesaid ten bottes, one bottle was empty and the remaining nine bottles contained 10 ml of cough syrup each, as detailed hereinabove. Since, no plausible explanation ever came to be rendered on record qua possession of aforesaid prohibited drug, police after having completed necessary codal formalities, lodged FIR, detailed hereinabove and arrested the bail-petitioner and since then, he is behind bars. Since challan stands filed in the competent Court of law and nothing remains to be recovered from the bail-petitioner, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings for grant of regular bail.

3. Mr. Deepak Kaushal, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, vehemently argued that bail-petitioner has been falsely implicated, as such, he cannot be left to be incarcerated in jail for indefinite period during trial. He submitted that it is yet to be established on record by the prosecution that bottles of Cough Syrup named hereinabove contained a prohibited drug i.e. Codeine. While making this Court peruse Section 2 (xi) of the ND & PS Act, Mr. Kaushal, vehemently argued that contraband allegedly recovered from the conscious possession of the bail petitioner does not fall in the definition of the “Manufactured Drug”. He submitted that since contraband alleged to be recovered from the bail-petitioner is not “Manufactured Drug”, recovery, if any, of the same from his conscious possession cannot be said to be under the ND & PS Act as defined under (xiv) of the ND & PS Act, which specifically defines “Narcotic Drug” as coca leaf, cannabis, opium, poppy straw and includes all manufactured goods. While referring to (xi)(b) of the ND & PS Act, Mr. Kaushal, argued that though Central Government has power to declare any other narcotic substance or preparation to be a “Manufactured Drug”, but that would not include any narcotic substance or preparation, which it without may having regard to the available information as to its nature or to a decision, if any, under any International Convention, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare not to be a “Manufactured Drug”. While referring to notification dated 14.11.1985 issued by the Central Government, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner argued that as per Entry 35, there is an exception made that Methyl morph

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top