SANDEEP SHARMA
Raghav Saini – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Since in all the above captioned cases, common question of law has arisen for adjudication and facts are almost similar, all the cases were clubbed and heard together and now, are being disposed of vide common judgment.
2. Bail petitioners namely Raghav Saini, Ram Lal, Harpinder and Manish Tomar @ Mani, who are behind the bars since 27.8.2022, 3.4.2022, 15.3.2022 and 28.9.2022, respectively, have approached this court in the instant proceedings filed under Section 439 Cr.PC, for grant of regular bail, in case FIR No(s). 182, 15, 46 and 104 of 2022, dated 27.8.2022, 3.4.2022, 15.3.2022 and 28.9.2022, registered at Police Station Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh, Police Station Kupvi, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, Police Station Rohru, District Shimla, HP and Police Station Paonta Sahib, District Nahan, H.P., under Sections 21, 22 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, “the NDPS Act”), respectively.
3. Certain facts of each case, which may be relevant for adjudication, are being noticed herein below:
Cr.MP(M) No. 2866 of 2022
4. On 27.8.2022, police after having received secrete information that ba
Manoranjana Sinh alias Gupta versus CBI
Paramjit Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar versus Ashis Chatterjee and another (2010) 14 SCC 496
Sanjay Chandra versus Central Bureau of Investigation (2012) 1 SCC 49
Shaheen Welfare Assn. v. Union of India
Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee v. Union of India
Umarmia Alias Mamumia v. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.