SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Pinky – Appellant
Versus
Amar Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ravinder Singh Chandel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.

Despite service, as none has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent, accordingly, he is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.

2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

“It is therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that the present petition may be very kindly be allowed and impugned order dated 10/11/2022 i.e Annexure P-3 passed in Execution Petition no. 11/2021 bearing CNR No. HPSH090000142-2021 titled as Amar Chand vs Pinky pending before the Ld. Senior Civil Judge Court No. 1 Rohru, Distt. Shimla, HP and the execution petition being not maintainable may very be quashed and set aside, with further direction to restore the stay application to its number and position, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.”

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order that has been passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Court No. 1, Rohru, District Shimla, H.P. dated 10.11.2022, in terms whereof, warrant of arrest has been issued against the present petitioner, who is the judgment debtor before the learned Court below.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order under challenge is perv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top