SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 143

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Gurbir Singh, J.
Anita Kumari Sohil @ Sohal – Appellant
Versus
Kanwarpal Singh Aneja – Respondent
Civil Revision No. 1255 of 2024
Decided On : 29-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Tarunvir Saini, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure prohibits the arrest or detention of women in execution of a decree for money.

Headnote:

Section 56 of CPC - Arrest of Woman in Execution of Decree for Money - Court directs petitioner to move application for recalling conditional warrant of arrest based on provision prohibiting arrest or detention of women in execution of decree for money.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a lady, challenged the conditional warrant of arrest issued against her for recovery of money in an execution application. She argued that as a woman, she cannot be arrested or detained for non-execution of any decree for money.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioner to move an application for recalling the conditional warrant of arrest, emphasizing the provision of Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure prohibiting the arrest or detention of women in execution of a decree for money.

Issues: Challenge to conditional warrant of arrest against the petitioner, interpretation of Section 56 of CPC regarding arrest of women in execution of decree for money.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 56 of CPC, which explicitly prohibits the arrest or detention of women in execution of a decree for money, and directed the petitioner to seek the recall of the warrant based on this provision.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and the court directed the petitioner to move an application for recalling the conditional warrant of arrest, with the stay of the warrant remaining in place until the disposal of the application.

Judgment

Mr. Gurbir Singh, J.

Challenge in this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the orders dated 19.01.2024 and 02.02.2024 (Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh, whereby conditional warrant of arrest against the petitioner has been issued for recovery of amount in Execution Application No.47 of 2020 titled as Kanwarpal Singh Aneja Versus Anita Kumari Sohal.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-judgment debtor inter alia submits the petitioner is a lady and a lady cannot be arrested/detained for non-execution of any decree for money. Reliance is placed on the judgment in Mary Chacko and another Versus Jancy Joseph and others, 2005(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 554, an authority of Division Bench of Kerala High Court. It is submitted that the award was passed in the Lok Adalat, Chandigarh on 13.07.2019 where the matter was settled and only installments of Rs.1.50 lacs were to be paid, but it was wrongly mentioned as Rs.2.50 lacs.

3. I have heard the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the file.

4. The award was passed by the Lok Adalat. The petitioner undertook to pay a sum of Rs.1.50 lacs by way of installments. In the execution application, conditional warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is ready to pay the amount but she is presently not in a position to pay the entire in due course. However, in order to show bona fide, the petitioner shall pay Rs.50,000/- to the respondent before the Executing Court by tomorrow since the execution is fixed for tomorrow i.e. 01.03.2024.

5. Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as under:-

“56. Prohibition of arrest or detention of women in execution of decree for money-Notwithstanding anything in this Part, the Court shall not order the arrest or detention in the civil prison of a woman in execution of a decree for the payment of money.”

6. A woman cannot be arrested or detained in execution of decree for money. Under such circumstances, the petitioner is directed to move an application before the Executing Court for recalling the order of conditional warrant of arrest issued against her. The Executing Court shall decide the said application keeping in view the provisions of Section 56 of CPC and till disposal of said application, the order of conditional warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner shall remain stayed.

7. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. Pending application, if any, shall also stand dispose of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top