GURBIR SINGH
Anita Kumari Sohil @ Sohal – Appellant
Versus
Kanwarpal Singh Aneja – Respondent
Judgment
Mr. Gurbir Singh, J.
Challenge in this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the orders dated 19.01.2024 and 02.02.2024 (Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh, whereby conditional warrant of arrest against the petitioner has been issued for recovery of amount in Execution Application No.47 of 2020 titled as Kanwarpal Singh Aneja Versus Anita Kumari Sohal.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-judgment debtor inter alia submits the petitioner is a lady and a lady cannot be arrested/detained for non-execution of any decree for money. Reliance is placed on the judgment in Mary Chacko and another Versus Jancy Joseph and others, 2005(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 554, an authority of Division Bench of Kerala High Court. It is submitted that the award was passed in the Lok Adalat, Chandigarh on 13.07.2019 where the matter was settled and only installments of Rs.1.50 lacs were to be paid, but it was wrongly mentioned as Rs.2.50 lacs.
3. I have heard the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the file.
4. The award was passed by the
Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure prohibits the arrest or detention of women in execution of a decree for money.
A court cannot issue a warrant of arrest against a woman in execution of a money decree as per Section 56 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Arrest of a judgment-debtor in civil proceedings requires strict adherence to procedural safeguards and evidence of willful neglect to pay.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.