Neeraj Bijalwan vs State of H.P. - 2025 Supreme(HP) 1314

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(HP) 1314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SUSHIL KUKREJA
Neeraj Bijalwan – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General, Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate

Table of Content
1. petition seeks anticipatory bail cancellation over alleged threats. (Para 1 , 2)
2. accused denies all post-bail threat allegations. (Para 3)
3. bail cancellation demands cogent supervening circumstances, not mechanical. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. no proof of threats or bail condition violations found. (Para 7 , 8)
5. petition dismissed; bail cancellation unwarranted. (Para 9)

Judgment :

Sushil Kukreja, J.

The instant petition under Section 483(3) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) has been filed by the petitioner seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 (accused) by this Court vide order dated 03.08.2023 in case FIR No. 196 of 2023, dated 24.06.2023, under Sections 452, 147, 148, 149, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”), registered at Police Station Sadar- Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.

2. According to the petitioner, respondent No. 2/accused, after obtaining the anticipatory bail from this Court started giving threats to him that if the complaint filed against the accused was not withdrawn, he would be done to death. Thereafter, when the petitioner tried to avoid Whatsapp calls of respondent No. 2/accused, he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document