Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA
Subhash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contractual computer operators granted regular pay scales. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parity claimed with previously regularized employees. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. mgnrega funding cited against regularization by dop. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. long ad-hocism violates articles 14 and 16. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. mgnrega for unskilled work excludes skilled operators. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. model employer must end long-term contractual exploitation. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. regularization from regular pay scale date ordered. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all the above captioned cases, and the petitioners herein are aggrieved by their non-regularization despite having completed requisite period as provided for regularization by the Government of Himachal Pradesh, this Court clubbed all the cases together for hearing, and now same are being disposed of vide this common judgment.
2. For having bird’s eye view, facts which are common in all the cases, are that vide notification dated 14.09.2007(Annexure P- 1), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh con
Contractual skilled employees with over 18 years continuous service and regular pay scale entitled to regularization despite scheme funding, as state cannot exploit long-term labour under temporary l....
Contractual employees in state-controlled societies executing departmental projects are state employees; corporate veil lifted to grant regularization after two years' service per policy, ensuring pa....
The court ruled that long-standing contractual employees performing essential government functions must be regularized, rejecting arguments of irregular initial appointments, thereby enforcing princi....
The court ruled that employees engaged continuously for over ten years are entitled to regularization, regardless of irregular appointment status, reaffirming precedents from the Supreme Court highli....
Casual employees with over two decades continuous service on perennial work entitled to regularization on parity with similarly situated peers, Tribunal has jurisdiction, rejecting lack of civil post....
Regularization of services for employees who have served for over ten years is a right that must be considered by the state, provided there are no valid objections, and the state must adhere to its o....
The court emphasized fair treatment and equal pay, mandating regularization of long-serving employees who were arbitrarily excluded from benefits, thereby reinforcing principles of equality under Art....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to regularization after completing ten years of service on sanctioned and vacant posts, as supported by constitutional....
The court emphasized that long uninterrupted service in governmental roles, despite initial irregular appointments, warrants consideration for regularization in accordance with established legal prec....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
