SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1122

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA
Nitin Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, & Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Senior Advocates with Mr. C.N.Singh, Dr. Nidhi Singh, Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Anshul Gandhi, Mr. Ramesh Chand, Mr. Rakesh Chauhan, Mr. Daleep Chand, Mr. Dhiraj Thakur, Ms. Priyanka Chandel, Mr. Rocky, Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sharma, Mr. Nitin Rishi, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Mr. Tek Chand, Mr. Arun Kaushal, Mr. Nimish Gupta and Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocates,
For the Respondents:Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, Mr. Naveen Kumar Pathania, Advocate, Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Kunal Thakur, CGC.

Table of Content
1. contractual appointments by state society in horticulture. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. society employees claim regularization per state policy. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14)
3. society autonomous; no regularization rights. (Para 12 , 13)
4. arguments on society control vs project temporariness. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. bylaws prove state control; prior regularizations. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
6. lift veil; precedents favor society employee regularization. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74)
7. distinguish precedents; no per incuriam; state liability. (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88)
8. regularize after two years contractual service. (Para 89 , 90)

Judgment :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Since common question of facts and law are involved in the above captioned cases and petitioners therein are aggrieved of inaction on the part of the respondents to regularize them from the date they have completed two years service on contrac









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top