IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Bhajan Dass – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.
1. The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 11.04.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge (Forests), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (learned Appellate Court), vide which judgment of conviction dated 24.11.2010 and order of sentence dated 29.11.2020, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class Court No.2, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (learned Trial Court), were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the police presented a challan against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 184 and 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act). It was asserted that informant Prem Chand (PW-1) and Shyam Lal Kashyap (PW-6) had parked their vehicle bearing registration No.HP06-3393 near Dhalli Link Road, Inder Nagar, towards the left side of the road on 03.04.2006, and were talking on the telephone. A truck bearing registration No. HP-63-1157 came from Sanjauli and hit the rear side


Negligence while driving under intoxication resulting in damage to property is a valid ground for conviction under criminal law, demonstrating the importance of maintaining road safety standards.
Revisional court acquits of rash driving/death charges where site plan shows victim vehicle on wrong side, speed unquantified, negligence opinions inadmissible; upholds conviction for fleeing without....
Rashness or negligence in driving not proved by accident alone, vague high speed claims, or absence of licence; injury inconsistency doubts prosecution; revisional jurisdiction limited to patent erro....
Revisional jurisdiction under CrPC Section 397 limited to patent errors/perversity, not re-appreciating evidence; driving on wrong side of road negligence causing accident, upheld conviction but redu....
Revisional jurisdiction limited to patent errors or perversity; no re-appreciation of evidence; overtaking on wrong side while ignoring oncoming traffic constitutes rash negligence justifying convict....
Revisional court upholds concurrent convictions for rash driving, drunk driving causing death where evidence shows wrong-side driving, high intoxication, absent perversity; limits interference to jur....
The revisional court exercises limited jurisdiction, focusing only on clear legal errors while upholding convictions based on substantial evidence of negligence.
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving resulting in death, emphasizing the reliability of eyewitness testimony and the inapplicability of probation for serious traffic offences.
The court held that concurrent findings of two lower courts regarding negligence and causation in a motor vehicle accident are binding unless proven erroneous, reinforcing limitations on the scope of....
Revisional jurisdiction under CrPC limits High Court to correcting patent defects or perversity; cannot reappreciate evidence to upset concurrent conviction absent jurisdictional error or miscarriage....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.