Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. negligent overtaking caused motorcycle accident injuries. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. lower courts convicted for rash driving negligence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. contradictions and motorcyclist speed alleged negligence. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 4. accused drove jeep on wrong road side. (Para 11) |
| 5. revisional court limits to patent errors. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. defence suggestions admit overtaking fact. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. overtaking must avoid danger; ignorance no defence. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. wrong side driving proves negligence. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. witnesses cannot opine negligence. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. high speed alone not negligence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 11. no adverse inference from omitted witnesses. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 12. no licence does not prove negligence. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 13. contradiction requires prior statement confrontation. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 14. negligence proved causing grievous hurt. (Para 47 , 48) |
| 15. no probation for rash driving. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 16. sentence upheld; revision dismissed. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 04.11.2014
Revisional jurisdiction limited to patent errors or perversity; no re-appreciation of evidence; overtaking on wrong side while ignoring oncoming traffic constitutes rash negligence justifying convict....
Revisional jurisdiction limited; cannot reappreciate evidence without perversity. Overtaking motorcycle on curve amid oncoming traffic is rash negligence under IPC Sections 279/337; probation inappli....
Revisional court acquits of rash driving/death charges where site plan shows victim vehicle on wrong side, speed unquantified, negligence opinions inadmissible; upholds conviction for fleeing without....
Negligence in driving leading to injury constitutes a violation under Sections 279 and 337 IPC, affirming strict liability for road traffic offenses.
Revisional jurisdiction confines to patent defects or perversity, not reappreciating evidence; concurrent findings on driver's identity and negligence in reversing without safety check upheld, sustai....
Revisional court upholds concurrent convictions for rash driving, drunk driving causing death where evidence shows wrong-side driving, high intoxication, absent perversity; limits interference to jur....
Revisional court cannot reappreciate evidence to upset concurrent convictions under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 absent perversity; driving on wrong side of narrow curve without precautions constitutes....
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving resulting in death, emphasizing the reliability of eyewitness testimony and the inapplicability of probation for serious traffic offences.
Negligence while driving under intoxication resulting in damage to property is a valid ground for conviction under criminal law, demonstrating the importance of maintaining road safety standards.
Revisional court cannot reappraise evidence unless perverse; wrong-side driving at high speed is negligent causing hurt under IPC 279/337/338; probation denied in road injury cases for deterrence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
