SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1534

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
The State H.R.T.C Conductor Union, Himachal Pradesh - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Anr. - Respondents
CWP No. 4956 of 2021
Decided On : 21-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vijay Chaudhary and Mr. Vijay Mokta, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate

Courts may rectify pay scale anomaly between historically equivalent posts arising from irrational partial adoption of revision notifications, without job evaluation or equating duties.

Headnote:(A) Pay Scales - Parity between posts of Conductor and Clerk in corporation - Posts enjoyed identical pay scales from 1978 till 01.10.2012 and w.e.f. 01.01.2016 - Anomaly w.e.f. 01.10.2012 to 01.01.2016 arose from corporation adopting state notification revising Clerk scale to Rs.10300-34800+3200 GP (after 2 years service) but enhancing only Grade Pay of Conductor from 1900 to 2400 - Anomaly irrational given historical parity - Corporation to grant same scale to Conductor for anomalous period. (Paras 2(i)-(v), 4(i)-(iv))

(B) Courts’ jurisdiction in pay fixation - Ordinarily refrain from job evaluation or equating unequal posts, but interference justified where historical pay parity disturbed by irrationality or non-application of mind, rectifying anomaly without upsetting broader structure. (Para 4(ii))

Facts of the case:
Union espousing conductors’ cause challenged pay scale disparity with clerks in corporation persisting w.e.f. 01.10.2012 to 01.01.2016, seeking revision to Rs.10300-34800+3200 GP with arrears, noting historical equivalence save that period due to selective adoption of state pay revision notification.

Findings of Court:
Respondents directed to release same pay scale to Conductor post for 01.10.2012 to 01.01.2016 as given to Clerks under corporation’s office order dated 24.10.2013, exercise within eight weeks.

Issues: Whether anomaly in pay scales between Conductor and Clerk during 01.10.2012-01.01.2016 to be rectified granting parity based on historical sameness.

Ratio Decidendi: Historical pay scale equivalence permits court to rectify brief anomaly from irrational partial implementation of pay revision notification, without comparing duties, responsibilities or qualifications.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. historical pay parity between conductor and clerk disrupted temporarily in 2012 (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. pay parity requires equivalence in duties, qualifications, responsibilities (Para 5)

Judgment :

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

Petitioner is a Union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 before the Registrar Trade Unions, Himachal Pradesh. It is seeking to espouse the cause of its members-the Conductors working in Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC)-respondent No.2, concerning anomaly in their pay-scale.

2. The case

Following facts are not in dispute:-

2(i) Respondent-HRTC came into existence on 02.10.1974. It framed Recruitment & Promotions Rules for its employees in the year 1976 and carried out amendments thereto from time to time in accordance with law. Post of Conductor in the respondent No.2-Corporation was in the pay-scale of Rs.110-200 prior to 01.01.1978 and in pay-scale of Rs. 400-600 as on 01.01.1978. The same was the pay- scale for the post of Clerk in the respondent No.2- Corporation. During third general revision of pay-scales, post of Conductor in respondent No.2-Corporation was assigned pay-scale of Rs.950-1800 with initial start of Rs.1000/- w.e.f. 01.01.1986. Post of Clerk in the respondent No.2- Corporation was also allocated the same pay scale. In the next general revision of pay-scales (4th), Rs.3120-5160 was the pay-scale for the post of Conductor in the HRTC. The same pay scale was given to the post of Clerk. In the 5th general revision of pay-scales, effective from 01.01.2006, the post of Conductor and that of Clerk in the respondent No.2- Corporation again had the same pay scale of Rs.5910-20200 + 1900 (GP). The above position is tabulated as under (provided by the respondent in office letter dated 29.10.2025):-

2(ii) The above table makes it evident that right from the first revision of pay-scale till the 4th revision, post of Conductor and Clerk in the respondent No.2-Corporation enjoyed the same pay-scale. Problem arose w.e.f. 01.10.2012. The genesis of the problem lay in a notification issued by the respondent No.1-State Government on 27.09.2012. This notification was issued in exercise of powers conferred by Rules 3 & 9 of the Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Category/Post wise Revised Pay) Rules 2012. The notification gave benefit of revised Pay Band and Grade Pay to 26 categories of posts in the State. The category of Clerk figured at Sr. No.15 of the notification. The revised Pay Band and Grade Pay given to this category under the aforesaid notification dated 27.09.2012 was as under: -

The post of Clerk, which was in the pay-scale of Rs.5910-20200 +1900 (GP) with initial start of Rs.7810 was to get pay-scale of Rs.10300-34800 + 3200 (GP) after two years of regular service w.e.f. 01.10.2012. The post of Conductor which admittedly did not exist in the respondent- State Government, was not included in the State notification dated 27.09.2012.

2(iii) Based upon the State Government notification dated 27.09.2012, respondent No.2-Corporation issued its office order on 24.10.2013 allowing its employees the same pay-scales as allowed by the State Government in the notification dated 27.09.2012 for the posts included in the said notification. Accordingly, the post of Clerk in the respondent No.2-Corporation, which was enjoying the pay- scale of Rs.5910-20200 +1900 (GP) was to have the pay- scale of Rs.10300-34800+3200 (GP) after two years of regular service w.e.f. 01.10.2012. The arrears for the period 01.10.2012 to 30.09.2013 were ordered to be credited in the Provident Fund Accounts of the concerned individuals and were to be paid in cash w.e.f. 01.10.2013.

The pay-scale of the Conductor in the respondent No.2-Corporation did not undergo any revision save and except enhancement of Grade Pay from Rs.1900/- to Rs.2400/-. For better comprehension, the revision carried out by respondent No.2-Corporation in the pay scales for the post of Clerk and Conductor under office order dated 24.10.2013

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top