IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Shiv Singh Sen – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:
“(i) That the order dated 19.07.2025 (Annexure P-6) and the order dated 16.06.2025 passed by respondent No.3 (Annexure P-3) may kindly be set aside in the interest of justice.
(ii) That the objection as well as the appeal filed by the present petitioner may kindly be allowed.”
2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that in terms of notification 24.05.2025, the State Election Commission in exercise of powers vested under Article 243ZA of the Constitution of India, read with Section 9 and 10 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 and Section 10 and 281 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act, 1994 read with Rules framed thereunder, issued the programme for delimitation of wards of Urban Local Bodies in the State (excluding Municipal Corporation, Shimla). The petitioner preferred objections with regard to the delimitation of the wards of Municipal Council, Sundernagar in terms of Annexure P-2, dated 06.06.2025. Deputy Commissioner, Mandi, vide order dated 16.06.2025 dismissed the objections filed by the petitioner against the draft delimita

Delimitation process requires equal population but lacks court intervention unless mala fides are demonstrated.
Delimitation exercises must adhere strictly to statutory provisions to ensure free and fair elections; failing to do so constitutes a colorable exercise of power.
The court affirmed that without new census data or changes in municipal boundaries, the delimitation of wards is unauthorized as per the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009.
The Delimitation Commission's authority to conduct delimitation is restricted to changes in population or the number of wards as specified in the Kerala Municipality Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in administrative actions, emphasizing the prevention of arbitrariness, irrationality, unreasonableness, bias,....
The use of census figures as the basis for ward formation and the discretion of the competent authority to allow a variation of up to 15% in population between wards.
Delimitation must be based on population figures from the last census as per Article 243p(g), not on voters list.
The delimitation process must adhere to the population data from the last census, and the methodology adopted by the Delimitation Commission was found to be reasonable and compliant with constitution....
Notification for municipal area inclusion quashed for lack of reasoned order on objections by competent authority; judicial review available despite delimitation bars if process arbitrary or based on....
The court held that notifications for delimitation of Gram Panchayats are administrative acts not subject to judicial review unless proven arbitrary, and non-adherence to internal guidelines does not....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.