SANJAY DHAR
Mushtaq Ahmad Ganie – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
Judgment
Sanjay Dhar, J.—The petitioners have challenged the order dated 26.12.2020, passed by District Magistrate, Shopian, respondent No.2 herein, whereby an order of eviction in terms of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Migrant Immovable Property (Preservation, Protection and Restraint on Distress Sales) Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1997’), has been passed against the petitioners. A further direction restraining respondent No.2 to 4 from acting upon aforesaid impugned order and from interfering in petitioners’ possession over the land measuring 04 kanals falling under Survey No.516/168 situated at Bongam, Shopian, has also been sought.
2. The case of the petitioners is that their predecessors-in-interest were cultivating land measuring 12 kanals and 05 marlas falling under survey No.169 and land measuring 04 kanals falling under Survey No.516/168 situated at Bongam, Shopian, as tenants from the times immemorial including in Kharif, 1971. The predecessors-in-interest of respondent No.7 to 9 are stated to be the owner/landlord of the aforesaid land. It is averred that so far as the land measuring 12 kanals and 05 marlas falling under Khasra No.169 is concerned
Gh. Mohammad Changa & Anr. v. State & Ors.
Rajeev Verma & anr. v. State & anr.
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai & others
The District Magistrate has the authority to take possession of migrant property and evict unauthorized occupants under the Act of 1997.
Possession of migrant property without express consent and proper authorization is deemed unauthorized under the J&K Migrant Immovable Property Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the J&K Migrant Immovable Act, 1997, specifically Section 8, can bar a civil suit and lead to its dismissal under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.
A statutory authority cannot revoke its own orders unless expressly permitted by the statute, and disputes regarding property title must be resolved in appropriate proceedings.
The court affirmed the application of the Jammu & Kashmir Migrant Immovable Property Act, ensuring protection of migrant property rights and addressing unauthorized occupation.
The court ruled that under the Jammu and Kashmir Migrant Immovable Property Act, surrendering possession is a precondition for filing an appeal against eviction, reflecting legislative intent in addr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.