High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar
Sanjeev Kumar, J.
Sabiya Rashid and Others – Appellant
Versus
University of Kashmir and Others – Respondent
WP(C) No.1797/2020 c/w CCP(S) No.98/2021
Decided on : 26-08-2022
Kashmir and Jammu Universities Act, 1969 – Section 16 – Regularisation – Chancellor of University is empowered to preside over meetings of University Council as also at convocations of Universities – No decision involving financial implications could be taken without approval of authorities like Syndicate and University Council – University of Kashmir and University of Jammu which are creatures of Act of 1969 are fully autonomous in character, both in institutional as well as financial matters – University Council is supreme body of University concerned and its decisions cannot be varied, modified or overturned by any authority, howsoever high it may be in its own affairs – Respondents shall go ahead with process of regularization of 84 casual/contractual engagees which include petitioners. (Paras 18, 19, 22, 24, 25 and 26)
JUDGMENT :
1. With a view to providing for regularization of various persons working in the University of Kashmir on casual, contractual or consolidated basis, a roadmap was prepared by the Financial Advisor (Universities) vide his No.FA-KU/JU/202-204.com/13 dated 20.08.2013. The roadmap prepared by the Financial Advisor (Universities) was approved by the University Council and process for regularization of persons engaged on casual/contractual basis was set in motion on the basis of guidelines promulgated by the University of Kashmir vide Notification No. F(Regular-Casual/Const-Gen.Adm) KU/14 dated 03.09.2014. The guidelines laid down in the said Notification are as under: –
(i) That he/she has been engaged in the Main Campus/Satellite Campuses of the University of Kashmir by the General Administration on the approval of the Competent Authority;
(ii) That he/she is continuously working on casual/consolidated/contractual basis without any break (other than the usual breaks/leave sanctioned by the authority i.e. Head of the Department/Directors/Coordinators/Librarian/Controller of Examinations);
(iii) That he/she possesses the requisite qualification and eligibility criteria required for the post on the date of his/her initial engagement on casual or ad hoc or contractual or consolidated basis;
(iv) That no disciplinary or criminal proceedings are pending against him/her on the appointed day i.e. date on which he/she is considered for regularization;
(v) That he/she has completed seven years or more service (uninterrupted) as such on the appointed day i.e. the date of regularization.
2. The Committee consisting of all the following shall examine/recommend the cases of casual/contractual workers presently engaged in the University for regularization under rules: –
(i) Vice-Chancellor;
(ii) Registrar;
(iii) Director General Accounts and Treasuries (from Finance Deptt.)
(iv) Director Budget (from Finance Deptt.)
(v) An officer of the Administration Deptt.
3. Procedure for regularization: –
(a) The Committee shall consider the cases of all the casual/contractual engagees who have completed seven years of uninterrupted service after the first engagement and who have been paid regularly by the University from available resources. Upon regularization, such of the engagees as cannot be regularized suitably against available posts, could be designated as “Helpers” and be given the pay scales applicable to the lowest class-IV of employees in the University as the case may be. For such a process of regularization, supernumerary and temporary posts of “Helpers” shall be created outside the normal/existing hierarchy of the University.
(b) Helpers could subsequently move to clear posts/vacancies in the formal organization hierarchy as and when these become available and the supernumerary/temporary posts of Helpers vacated by the incumbents shall automatically get abolished.
4. The following shall not be considered for regularization: –
(a) Persons engaged on casual/contractual/consolidated basis in whose favour engagement order has not been issued by the General Administration of the University i.e without the approval of the Competent Authority.
(b) Persons engaged in the Research Projects/Schemes sponsored by various Govt./Private Agencies.
5. The regularization of the eligible casual or contractual or consolidated engagees shall have effect only from the date of such regularization irrespective of the fact that such engagees have completed more than seven years of service on the date of regularization.
6. The persons engaged on casual or contractual or consolidated basis who have not completed seven years shall continue as such till completion of seven years and shall thereafter be considered for regularization.
7. There will be complete ban on engagement of casual/contractual workers.
2. The Empowered C
: There can be no undue discrimination in matter of regularisation of service..
The University Council is the supreme body of the University concerned and its decisions cannot be varied, modified, or overturned by any authority, howsoever high it may be in its own affairs.
Employment and Service matter - Regularization of services - Challenged - Absence of any document or material in rebuttal from University authorities it can safely be stated that all the four writ pe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for proper consideration of regularization against specific posts based on the duties performed by the employees and the conditions specif....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of treating similarly situated persons alike and the obligation of the employer to extend benefits to all eligible employees.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.