JAVED IQBAL WANI
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JAVED IQBAL WANI, J.
1. Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (previously Section 561-A Cr.P.C.) is being invoked by the petitioners for setting aside and quashing the police challan/final report No. 129/2021 dated 22.11.2021 titled as, UT of J&K vs. Ravi Kumar and Another, pending before the Court of learned Sub-Judge/Special Mobile Magistrate (13th Finance) Jammu, arising out of FIR No. 175/2021 dated 05.11.2021, registered with Police Station, Jhajjar Kotli, Jammu under Sections 451, 323, 504, 506 and 34 IPC against the petitioners along with all proceedings arising out of the said police challan.
2. The parties are stated to have entered into a compromise and settled their disputes and differences, whereunder the impugned FIR had got registered at the instance of respondent No. 3 against the petitioners and consequently, a compromise deed is placed on record of the instant petition.
3. In view of the compromise so arrived at between the parties, the petitioner, as also the respondent No. 3 in terms of order dated 22.03.2022 were directed to appear before the Registrar Judicial for recording their statements in support of the deed of compromise. The statements o
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings or FIR on the ground of settlement between the offender and the victim, as guided b....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. allows for the quashing of FIRs when the parties have settled their disputes amicably, provided the offences do not involv....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIRs, considering the nature and gravity of the crime, the distinction bet....
The power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the of....
The court's decision was based on the application of the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another, ....
The High Court has the inherent power to quash FIRs in cases where the parties have reached a compromise, particularly in disputes of a private nature, provided that the nature of the offences does n....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash FIRs in cases where the dispute is predominantly civil and a compromise has been reached, provided the possi....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash FIRs in cases where the parties have reached a settlement, particularly in disputes with a civil nature, p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.