Back
JAVED IQBAL WANI
Tariq Ahmad Waza – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K Thr. SHO Ganderbal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JAVED IQBAL WANI, J.
1. Inherent jurisdiction of this Court u/s 482 CrPC is being invoked by the petitioner for quashment of FIR No. 328/2020 dated 24.11.2020, registered at Police Station, Ganderbal, Kashmir, under Sections 354, 323, 392, 506, 201 IPC 1860.
2. The background facts, those stem out from the petition, according to the petitioner, are that the petitioner is working in Fire Service Emergency Department, Kashmir, as a Firemen Driver. It is submitted that respondent no. 2 due to some misunderstanding lodged a complaint on 24.11.2020 alleging therein that on 21.11.2020 the petitioner pushed the respondent no. 2 inside the car and gave several blows to respondent no. 2 on her face and the respondent no. 2 started bleeding from the nose and the eye. It is submitted that the respondent no. 2 also alleged that the petitioner snatched one gold bangle and a sum of Rs. 11,300/- from the respondent, besides physically abusing and assaulting her.
3. It is submitted that after registration of the FIR dated 24.11.2020, the petitioner was arrested on 25.11.2020 by respondent no. 1 and on 26.11.2020, the petitioner was produced before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ganderbal
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash FIRs in cases where the dispute is predominantly civil and a compromise has been reached, provided the possi....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. allows for the quashing of FIRs when the parties have settled their disputes amicably, provided the offences do not involv....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIRs, considering the nature and gravity of the crime, the distinction bet....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings or FIR on the ground of settlement between the offender and the victim, as guided b....
The power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the of....
The court's decision was based on the application of the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another, ....
The High Court has the inherent power to quash FIRs in cases where the parties have reached a compromise, particularly in disputes of a private nature, provided that the nature of the offences does n....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash FIRs in cases where the parties have reached a settlement, particularly in disputes with a civil nature, p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
