Back
JAVED IQBAL WANI
Arayavir Singh – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JAVED IQBAL WANI, J.
CRM (M) Nos. 669/2021 and 120/2021
1. Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (previously Section 561-A Cr.P.C.) is being invoked by the petitioners in both the petitions for quashment of FIR No. 103/2019 dated 09.11.2019, registered with Police Station, Majalta at the instance of respondent No. 2, namely, Nirmal for commission of offences under Sections 451, 354, 504 and 506 IPC, pending before the Court of learned Munsiff, Majalta in CRM (M) No. 669/2021 and also quashment of FIR No. 09/2020 dated 19.01.2020, registered with the same Police Station at the instance of respondent No. 2, namely, Aryavir Singh for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 341, 323, 384, 34, 504 and 506 IPC in CRM (M) No. 120/2021.
2. The parties are stated to have entered into a compromise and settled their disputes and differences, whereunder the impugned FIRs had got registered at the instance of respondent No. 2, namely, Nirmal in CRM (M) No. 669/2021 and respondent No. 2, namely, Aryavir Singh in CRM (M) No. 120/2021 against the petitioners.
3. In view of the compromise so arrived at between the parties, the petitioners, as also the respondent No. 2, nam
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIRs, considering the nature and gravity of the crime, the distinction bet....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. allows for the quashing of FIRs when the parties have settled their disputes amicably, provided the offences do not involv....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings or FIR on the ground of settlement between the offender and the victim, as guided b....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash FIRs in cases where the dispute is predominantly civil and a compromise has been reached, provided the possi....
The court's decision was based on the application of the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another, ....
The High Court has the inherent power to quash FIRs in cases where the parties have reached a compromise, particularly in disputes of a private nature, provided that the nature of the offences does n....
The power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the of....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code even for non-compoundable offences if the parties have reached a settlement, provided that continuing th....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash FIRs in cases where the parties have reached a settlement, particularly in disputes with a civil nature, p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
