Back
JAVED IQBAL WANI
Nazir Ahmad Ganie – Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JAVED IQBAL WANI, J.
1. Inherent jurisdiction under and in terms of provisions of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) is being invoked by the petitioners for quashment of FIR Nos. 32/2019, dated 20.06.2019, 62/2019, dated 21.11.2019, 80/2021, dated 11.11.2021 & 81/2021, dated 11.11.2021, registered with Police Station Manzgam, Kulgam & also the proceedings commenced pursuant thereto pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class D.H. Pora, Kulgam.
2. The parties are stated to have entered into a compromise and settled their disputes and differences, which had resulted in registration of the impugned FIRs at the instance of petitioners 1 to 10 and cross FIRs at the instance of petitioners 11 to 17 and, consequently, a compromise deed is placed on record of the instant petition.
3. In view of the compromise so arrived at between the petitioners 1 to 10 and petitioners 11 to 17, all the petitioners in terms of order dated 27.09.2022, were directed to appear before the Registrar Judicial of this Court for recording their statements in support of the deed of compromise. The statements of all the petitioners have been recorded on 10.10.2022, by the R
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. allows for the quashing of FIRs when the parties have settled their disputes amicably, provided the offences do not involv....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIRs, considering the nature and gravity of the crime, the distinction bet....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings or FIR on the ground of settlement between the offender and the victim, as guided b....
The High Court has the inherent power to quash FIRs in cases where the parties have reached a compromise, particularly in disputes of a private nature, provided that the nature of the offences does n....
The power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the of....
The court's decision was based on the application of the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another, ....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash FIRs in cases where the dispute is predominantly civil and a compromise has been reached, provided the possi....
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash FIRs in cases where the parties have reached a settlement, particularly in disputes with a civil nature, p....
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences under Section 482 if they are personal in nature and the parties have settled their disputes amicably, ensuring no adverse effect on public interest....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
