Back
RAJNESH OSWAL
Pushpa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jai Prakash Association Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajnesh Oswal, J. - This is an application seeking condonation of delay 413 days in filing the appeal against the judgment dated 22.08.2014 passed by the Commissioner, Employees Compensation Act (Assistant Labour Commissioner), Doda on the ground that the applicants are poor, illiterate and belong to a remote area of Doda District. The applicants were not informed about the remedy to be availed by them after dismissal of their claim petition and it was only when the applicants contacted their counsel, who advised them to file an appeal before this Court. It is stated that the deceased was the only earning source of the family, who died due to injuries caused in an accident.
2. Objections have been filed by the respondents. The respondent No. 1 has stated in the objections that the explanation tendered by the applicants in seeking the condonation of delay is concocted and not trustworthy. No premium can be given to the applicants for their lethargy and utter negligence in seeking the condonation of delay and further that the applicants have not accounted the delay with effect from 23.08.2014 till the date, the instant application was filed.
3. The respondent No. 2 has also fil
Liberal and pragmatic approach in considering applications for condonation of delay, especially in cases related to social welfare legislation.
The court emphasized that condonation of delay is a discretionary power, requiring a sufficient explanation rather than mere excuses, and found the reasons for delay in this case satisfactory.
The liberal construction of labour statutes in favor of employees and the consideration of disability and timely knowledge in condoning the delay in filing the claim petition.
An application for condonation of delay must demonstrate plausible reasons; mere bureaucratic delays do not justify extending time limits for appeals.
Condonation of delay granted based on sufficient cause including financial hardship and COVID exclusion, prioritizing justice over length.
The government cannot benefit from its own wrong, and a valuable right accrued due to the appellants' inaction.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the liberal interpretation of compensation provisions under the Act and the condonation of delay in filing appeals based on the poor economic st....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
