IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
N. KOTISWAR SINGH, RAJNESH OSWAL, JJ.
Saima Ashraf - Petitioner
Versus
Government of Jammu and Kashmir (UT) through Chairman, J&K Public Service Commission & Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No. 408 Of 2022 & CM No. 1001 Of 2022
Decided On : 27-03-2023
DOMICILE CERTIFICATE - SUBMISSION AFTER CUT-OFF DATE - REJECTION OF CANDIDATURE - VALIDITY - CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED - HELD, CANDIDATURE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN REJECTED - PETITION ALLOWED.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, a permanent resident of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, applied for the Jammu & Kashmir Combined Competitive (Preliminary) Examination, 2021. She submitted the Resident of Backward Area (RBA) certificate along with her application within time. She was declared successful in the Preliminary Examination and allowed to appear in the Mains Examination. However, her candidature was rejected by the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission (JKPSC) on the ground that she submitted the Domicile Certificate after the cut-off date. Petitioner challenged the rejection order before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar, which declined to interfere with the JKPSC's decision. Petitioner then approached the High Court.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court allowed the petition and set aside the impugned orders passed by the JKPSC and the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court held that the petitioner's candidature could not have been rejected solely on the ground of late submission of the Domicile Certificate. The Court noted that the petitioner was already a domicile of the UT of Jammu and Kashmir in terms of the RBA certificate supported by Permanent Residence Certificate, though the proof thereof in the form of the proper Domicile Certificate was obtained and submitted after the cut-off date. The Court also noted that the petitioner had submitted the Domicile Certificate at the time of submission of the application form for the Main Examination and hence, before the completion of the recruitment process, thus, not adversely affecting any accrued right of any candidate.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's candidature could have been rejected solely on the ground of late submission of the Domicile Certificate.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the petitioner's candidature could not have been rejected solely on the ground of late submission of the Domicile Certificate. The Court noted that the petitioner was already a domicile of the UT of Jammu and Kashmir in terms of the RBA certificate supported by Permanent Residence Certificate, though the proof thereof in the form of the proper Domicile Certificate was obtained and submitted after the cut-off date. The Court also noted that the petitioner had submitted the Domicile Certificate at the time of submission of the application form for the Main Examination and hence, before the completion of the recruitment process, thus, not adversely affecting any accrued right of any candidate.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the petition and set aside the impugned orders passed by the JKPSC and the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court directed the JKPSC to declare the result of the petitioner and, if the petitioner is found to be meritorious enough amongst the candidates applying against the posts reserved for candidates under the Resident of Backward Area (RBA) category for being included in the merit list for consideration for appointment, she shall be so included in the merit list for the purpose of giving appointment.
JUDGMENT :
(N. Kotiswar Singh, J.)
1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 1st March, 2022, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar, (for short 'the Tribunal') in O.A. No. 108/2022, by which the learned Tribunal declined to interfere with the notice dated 3rd of February, 2022 issued by the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission (for short 'the Commission' or JKPSC) rejecting the candidature of the petitioner, on the ground of non-submission of Domicile Certificate within the cut-off date mentioned in the advertisement, but merely directed the respondent authorities to treat the application filed by her before the Tribunal as a representation and dispose of the same.
2. According to the petitioner, her candidature could not have been rejected by the JKPSC on the aforesaid ground in as much as she had submitted the Resident of Backward Area (RBA) certificate along with her application within time and she had also submitted the Domicile Certificate before the Main Examination along with the application form for the Main Examination required to be submitted after clearing the Preliminary Examination.
3. Brief facts of the case as may be relevant for consideration of the petition may be stated as follows:
4. The petitioner is a permanent resident of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and had completed her Graduation in Fisheries Science from the Sher-i-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Kashmir. Being a permanent resident of the Jammu and Kashmir and that too of a backward area, she duly obtained the Permanent Resident Certificate (PRC) which was issued on 07.08.2012 under the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir which clearly shows that she is a permanent resident of the Jammu and Kashmir State. She also possessed the certificate of being a resident of backward area (RBA) which was renewed on 10th April, 2021, before the cut-off date mentioned in the advertisement, which would also prove that she is a permanent resident and hence permanently domiciled in the UT of Jammu and Kashmir and also belongs to a backward area.
5. The Jammu & Kashmir Public Service Commission had issued a notification on 26th February, 2021, inviting applications for appearing in the Jammu & Kashmir Combined Competitive (Preliminary) Examination, 2021 from applicants who are domiciled in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The last date of submission of applications was 12.04.2021. As per the said notification, 19 (nineteen) posts were reserved to be filled up under the RBA category. According to the petitioner, she duly applied for the said post by submitting necessary documents including the RBA certificate within time which were duly accepted by the authorities. According to the petitioner, the Commission being satisfied with the same allowed her to appear in the Preliminary Examination which was conducted on 24th October, 2021, in which she was declared successful which would have enabled her to appear in the Mains Examination as notified vide notification dated 13th November, 2021.
6. Thereafter, the Commission again invited online applications from the successful candidates vide notification dated 26th November, 2021, to be submitted by 20.12.2021. The last date of submission of application forms for the Main Examination was subsequently extended up to 6th January, 2022. The petitioner, accordingly, submitted her application along with the requisite documents including the Domicile Certificate.
7. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, having been declared successful in the Preliminary Examination and also been allowed to submit the online application form in terms of the notification dated 26th November, 2021, the petitioner was expecting to appear in the Main Examination and was preparing for the same. Unfortunately, by the impugned notice dated 3rd February, 2022, issued by the Commission, the candidature of the petitioner, along with some others m
J&K Public Service Commission & Anr. v. Ms. RimpiOhri & Anr.
Tasneem Kounsar & Ors., v. State & Ors.
Dolly Chhanda v. Chairman, JEE & Ors., AIR 2004 SC 5043
Ram Kumar Gijroya v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr.
Indra Sawhney etc. v. Union of India & Ors.
Mrs. Valsammapaul etc. v. Cochin University & Ors.
Ram Kumar Gijroya v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board
Valsamma Paul v. Cochin University
Dolly Chhanda v. Chairman, JEE
Ram Kumar Gijroya v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr.
Alok Kumar Singh v. State of U.P.
Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Chander Shekhar
Bharti Koshal Bhat (Dr.) v. State of J&K & Ors.
Ashok Kumar Sharma (supra) and J&K Public Service Commission v. Israr Ahmad
J&K Public Service Commission v. Israr Ahmad & Ors., (2005) 12 SCC 498
AI
Competitive examination - Successful completion of any competitive examination, which are having candidates of different categories based upon many factors like physically handicapped, vertical or ho....
The court established that for claiming reservation benefits under the Jharkhand Reservation Rules, a caste certificate must be in the prescribed format that specifies the candidate's category and no....
Adherence to specified deadlines and requirements outlined in the advertisement is crucial for the validity of caste certificates and the selection process.
Eligibility for reserved category appointments is contingent upon timely submission of required certificates; late submissions disqualify candidates under prescribed rules.
The possession of necessary certificates before the cut-off date is essential, and there can be relaxation in the matter of submission of proof.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.