IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
M.A. CHOWDHARY, J.
Sohan Lal Sharma – Petitioner
Versus
UT of J. & K. & Anr. – Respondents
CRM(M) No. 586 Of 2022
Decided On : 03-02-2023
ABETMENT - Criminal Procedure - 482 - [366/376 IPC] - The court discussed the scope of power of the High Court under section 482 of the Cr.P.C and laid down principles for quashing criminal proceedings. The court emphasized that the power to quash criminal proceedings should be exercised sparingly and only in deserving cases. It highlighted that the veracity of the allegations in the FIR should be tested by the investigating agency and that the court cannot determine the merits of the allegations in the present proceedings. The court also noted that even allegations of mala fides against the informant are not a ground for quashing the criminal proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a defense personnel, sought quashment of an FIR alleging his involvement in the commission of offences punishable under section 366/376 IPC. He contended that the allegations were baseless and malicious, and the FIR was lodged to pressure him into marriage. The respondent countered that the petitioner was involved in a serious crime against women and society.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the contents of the impugned FIR disclosed the commission of cognizable offences by the petitioner. It emphasized that the veracity of the allegations should be tested by the investigating agency and that the exercise of jurisdiction under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the impugned FIR would amount to stifling a legitimate prosecution.
Issues: The issues revolved around the allegations of baseless and malicious FIR, the petitioner's contention of pressure for marriage, and the respondent's counter-allegations of serious crimes against women and society.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the power to quash criminal proceedings should be exercised sparingly and only in deserving cases. It highlighted that the veracity of the allegations in the FIR should be tested by the investigating agency and that the court cannot determine the merits of the allegations in the present proceedings.
Final Decision: The petition seeking quashment of the FIR was dismissed by the court.
JUDGMENT :
1. This petition has been filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of the FIR No. 72/2022 dated 26.06.2022 registered at Police Station Thathri Doda, at the behest of respondent No. 2, wherein the petitioner-accused person was found involved in the commission of offence punishable under section 366/376 IPC.
2. Petitioner/accused pleaded following facts:-
b) That the daughter of the complainant who is doing her MA and is major girl residing in nearby village, managed Whatsapp number of the petitioner and started messaging him from her Mobile No. 9149699762 and expressed her desire to marry with the petitioner. At the time when the daughter of the complainant started sending messages to the petitioner, the petitioner was on his active duty in Kashmir Valley. The petitioner has never indulged in any such activity with the daughter of the complainant which could be termed as indecent or offensive. Thereafter the complainant and her daughter have been time and again approaching the mother of the petitioner for marriage of the petitioner with the daughter of the respondent no. 2 but the petitioner has all along refused the proposal. The daughter of the complainant has been time and again and at regular intervals pressurizing and trying to persuade the petitioner to marry with her but the petitioner always has categorically been telling her that he is not willing to marry her. She has been constantly text messaging the petitioner and using all her means to force the petitioner to marry her but the petitioner has never agreed to her demand and she has even been threatening the petitioner in her text messages that she will get her marriage solemnized with the petitioner even forcibly. She says in her text message: ''Mai apse Zabardasti bhi Shadi Krvayu gi. Par Abhi nhi. Tum ana par. Bht hua apka drama". This is chat of April 2022 at 10:40 p.m., there are other messages also which clearly show that it is the daughter of the respondent no.2 who has been constantly trying to force the petitioner to marry with her but the petitioner has always been showing no interest in marriage with the daughter of the respondent no. 2.
c) That the missing of the daughter of the respondent no. 2 on 19.06.2022 and a report with the police on 20.06.2022 where the petitioner is nowhere figuring in the whole story of the complainant that her daughter had gone to Jammu, lived one night at Jammu and then went to Srinagar with some unknown lady lived with her in a hotel at Srinagar and then she was recovered by the Thathri Police from Outskirts of Srinagar. The petitioner has no concern with this whole episode but the complainant has tried to use this episode to falsely implicate the petitioner in a serious criminal case of abduction and rape only to blackmail the petitioner for contracting marriage with her daughter. The allegations of the complainant that the petitioner had called her daughter on phone during night at 10:00 p.m. and told her that he will marry with her and under this garb committed rape upon the daughter of the complainant, is a story which ex-facie appears to be fabrication and a plot to falsely involve the petitioner.
d) That the falsity of the allegations is clear from the fact that once the complainant had lodged a missing report of her daughter with the respondent No. 1 and he, in pursuance to this report, recovered the girl (daughter of the complainant) from Srinagar, then the girl must have told the whole story to the respondent no. 1 and had there been any such thing happened with the girl, she would have told the Police and Police would have registered the case but that did not happen because after the police recovered the girl, based on
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Golconda Linga Swamy
The power to quash criminal proceedings should be exercised sparingly and only in deserving cases. The veracity of the allegations in the FIR should be tested by the investigating agency, and the cou....
The power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 should be exercised sparingly, carefully, and with caution, and only when justified by the tests laid down in the section itself. Q....
Inherent powers under Section 482 of CrPC should be exercised sparingly to prevent misuse of criminal law, quashing only when FIR doesn't disclose an offence.
The power to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of Cr. P.C. should be sparingly exercised and only in deserving cases. Mala fide allegations by the complainant cannot be a ground for quashi....
Quash a Proceeding - Power under section 482 Cr.P.C. entitles the High Court to quash a proceeding when it comes to the conclusion that allowing the proceedings to continue would be an abuse of the p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.