A. BADHARUDEEN
Vignesh Kumar Balasundar, S/O. Balasundar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash Annexure 1 FIR in Crime No.761/2023 of Medical College Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 498A r/w Section 34 of the IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, a private complaint filed before the Magistrate Court, was forwarded to the police, whereby, FIR in Crime No.761/2023 was registered. But the complaint and the FIR do not disclose essentials to constitute an offence punishable under Section 498A r/w Section 34 of the IPC. Therefore, the FIR is liable to be quashed.
4. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that, the contents in the complaint filed by the 2nd respondent herein, prima facie, discloses materials warranting investigation for the offence on the basis of FIR registered. Therefore, quashment of FIR cannot be considered and the same deserves dismissal.
5. Adverting to the essentials to quash FIR, the Hon’ble Apex Court in [1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : (AIR 1992 SC 604)] (State of Haryana a
Arnab Manoranjan Goswami v State of Maharashtra
Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar v State of Maharashtra
Kapil Aggarwal and Others v. Sanjay Sharma and Others (AIR 2021 SC 1241)
Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and Others
Parbatbhai Aahir v State of Gujarat
State of Karnataka v M Devendrappa
State of Haryana and others v. Bhajan Lal and others
SW Palanitkar v. State of Bihar
Uma Shankar Gopalika v State of Bihar
Usha Chakraborty and Another v. State of West Bengal and Another reported in AIR 2023 SC 688
Point of law : Needless to point out that if the law provides a particular remedy to an accused, then it is always open for him to exhaust the same while approaching the concerned Court while filing ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the inherent power under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be sparingly used and only in exceptional cases to prevent abuse of....
The court emphasized the need for compelling reasons of abuse of process of law or glaring injustice to invoke the inherent powers of the High Court and highlighted the need for circumspection and ca....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the CrPC to prevent abuse of the process of law and to secure the ends of justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.