SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Mohan Lal, J.
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir Through Senior Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Swroop Gupta s/o Karam Chand Gupta and ors. – Respondents
CrlA(AS) No. 11 of 2023
Decided On : 09-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
For the Respondent:Sh. Jagpaul Singh Advocate for Sh. Rajnish Raina Advocate

The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt; failure to present credible evidence leads to acquittal in corruption charges.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 - Sections 5(1)(d) and 5(2) - Jammu and Kashmir Ranbir Penal Code, Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B - Acquittal of respondents in corruption case - Trial court acquitted respondents stating prosecution failed to establish a conspiracy to allot state land illegally - Key evidence relied upon was circumstantial and the credibility of witness testimonies was found lacking - Prosecution did not prove necessary connections between accused and alleged illegal acts. (Paras 11-15)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Standard of proof - Prosecution is required to prove the guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, failing which acquittal is maintained - Evidence inadequacies render all charges against accused insufficient for a conviction. (Paras 12-14)

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and background (Para 1)
2. appellant's challenges against the impugned judgment (Para 2)
3. outlines the grounds for appeal and summary of lower court's ruling. (Para 3)
4. defendant's arguments regarding lack of conspiracy and evidence (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
5. includes evidence analyzed by the court and observations made regarding credibility. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
6. prosecution's evidence questioned (Para 11 , 12)
7. details the legal reasoning and analysis leading to the court's conclusions. (Para 13)
8. final judgment and affirmation of the first instance court's decision. (Para 14)
9. summary of findings regarding evidence sufficiency (Para 15)

JUDGMENT :

1. Instant Criminal Acquittal Appeal is directed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 28.02.2022 rendered by the court of Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge (Anti-Corruption) Jammu in FIR No. 28/2006 bearing file No. 07/Challan/02/Challan titled State through Police Station Vigilance Organization Jammu (VOJ) Versus Shanti Swroop & Ors, whereby, respondents have been acquitted for commission of offences punishable under sections 5(2) r/w 5(1) (d) P.C. Act 2006 r/w sections 420,465,468, 471, 120-B, RPC.

2. Aggrieved of and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment, appellant has questioned it’s legality, propriety and correctness, has sought it’s setting aside/quashment, and has further sought the conviction of respondents on the following grounds:-

    (i) that the judgment impugned is contrary to law, against facts of the case and has been passed in a mechanical manner without appreciating the circumstantial and other evidence available on record;

    (ii) that from the search of residential premises of R-1 Shanti Swroop Gupta (now dead) original order No. 139/REH dated 28.01.2005 signed and issued by him as the then Tehsildar Jammu relating to illegal allotment of State Land measuring 219 kanals and 1 marla in favour of 7 displaced persons alongwith photocopies of the applications of 7 displaced persons in whose favour the aforesaid State Land has been fraudulently allotted have been seized;

    (iii) that incriminating document viz; photocopy of fraudulent allotment order No. 139/REH dated 28.01.2005 alongwith photocopies of irrevocable power of attorneys executed by the allottees namely Amrik Singh, Harmeet Singh & Doulat Ram in the name of R-3 Baldev Singh, coupled with original affidavits sworn by the allottees Janak Singh, Prema Devi (w/o late Sh. Munshi Ram) & Madan Lal showing receipt of amount by them and surrendering the land taken by them alongwith original unsigned affidavits in the names of Ram Chand (S/O Beli Ram) Meena Wanti (w/o late Mani Ram), Doulat Ram, Swroop Singh showing receipt of payment by them have been seized and proved before the trial court;

    (iv) that the investigation revealed that under a well knit conspiracy accused Baldev Singh (R-3) a real estate dealer dishonestly managed to obtained applications from aforesaid 7 displaced persons namely, Meena Wati, Swroop Singh, Janak Singh, Doulat Ram, Raj Singh, Amlook Singh & Harmeet Singh in the name of the then State Revenue Minister for allotment of deficient land in their favour as displaced persons through one of his contact man late Tika Ram (the then Girdawar Tehsil Office Jammu) who was residing in the neighborhood of above said displaced persons, the displaced persons were made to believe that deficient land allotted in their favour will be made good by allotting them additional quota of land due to them as per Cabinet Order No. 578-C of 1954 under which the State Land was allotted to displaced persons of 1947-1965 from PoK, R-3 accused Baldev Singh Subsequently got the applications endorsed by the then Revenue Minister in the name of Deputy Commissioner Jammu for action under rules, the said application as a part of criminal conspiracy were processed by R-1 (accused

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top