JUDGMENT :

Rajesh Sekhri, J.

1. An FIR came to be registered against the appellant, by respondent No.2, on the directions of learned Additional Special Mobile Magistrate, Doda (hereinafter referred to as the trial court), on an application preferred by respondent No.1, in terms of Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1989 (for short, Cr.P.C.). The appellant invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to implore for quashment of the said order dated 24.08.2023, passed by learned trial court, which petition came to be dismissed by learned Single Judge of this Court on 04.09.2023.

2. The appellant has invoked Rule 12 of Letters Patent Rules for quashment of both the orders dated 04.09.2023, passed by learned Single Judge of this Court and 24.08.2023 passed by learned trial court on multiple grounds urged in the memo of appeal.

3. Heard and perused.

4. It is by far a crystallized position of law and no longer remains res integra now that in terms of Rule 12 of Letters Patent of J&K, intra court appeal against an order passed by a Single Judge of this Court, in exercise of inherent powers envisaged under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is not maintainable. A Co-ordina