IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, J.
Dr. Mushtaq Ahmad S/o Late Abdul Salam Hakim – Appellant
Versus
SKIMS Soura, Srinagar, through Chairman Governing Body – Respondent
WP(C) No. 2749 of 2022, CM No.6956 and 927 of 2023
Decided on : 04-10-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to advertisement notice and appointment. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner highlights discrepancies in recruitment process. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 15 , 27 , 37) |
| 3. claim based on ratio of medical/non-medical faculty. (Para 14 , 17 , 20 , 24) |
| 4. petitioner seeks appointment against assistant professor post. (Para 18) |
| 5. defendant's position regarding selection criteria and processes. (Para 22 , 30 , 42 , 46) |
| 6. court analyzes obligations of respondents in hiring. (Para 49 , 51 , 54 , 60 , 66) |
| 7. post advertisement obligations and hiring criteria established. (Para 63 , 72 , 76) |
| 8. the court allows the writ due to procedural irregularities. (Para 90) |
| 9. writ petition allowed; decision on appointment and criteria upheld. (Para 91 , 92 , 93) |
JUDGMENT :
BRIEF FACTS:
1. The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner, in which he has called in question the impugned Advertisement Notice No. 02 of 2021 dated 17th April, 2021, besides called in question the order of Consideration bearing no. SIMS 130(P) of 2022 dated 30.07.2022 issued by Respondent No. 2. The petitioner has also sought a Writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking a direction against the respondents to select and appoint the petitioner against the post of Assistant Professor in Clinical Pharmacology, from amongst the Non-Medical Candidates by giving the benefit of such appointment from the date the same has been given to the Respondent No.3.
2. The instant petition came to be listed before this Court on 6th December 2022, in terms whereof this Court after feeling prima facie satisfied, restrained the official respondents from finalizing the selection to the post of Assistant Professor, Clinical Pharmacology.
3. Before indicating the grounds of challenge against impugned advertisement notice, it would be apt to refer to the brief factual background of the case, with a view to decide the controversy in question.
4. The petitioner has passed his M.Sc. Pharmacology from a recognized University and has obtained Ph.D. in Medical Pharmacology from a recognized University and pursuant thereto, the petitioner was appointed as Demonstrator in SKIMS Medical College, Bemina, Srinagar, on 8th May, 2003 and continued as such up to 26th July, 2007. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Professor in Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Jaipur on 18.10.2007 on substantive basis and he continued to work as Assistant Professor (Pharmacology) in the said college upto 17.10.2012. The petitioner was appointed as Associate Professor in the aforesaid college on 18.10.2012, on the basis of his Ph.D. Degree in Pharmacology. As per the stand of the petitioner, he was also appointed as Professor, Department of Pharmacology, on academic arrangement basis, at Government Medical College, Doda, where the petitioner was performing his duties as Professor and Head of Department, Pharmacology, at the time of filing of the writ petition.
5. As per the stand of the petitioner, in terms of Advertisement Notice No. 1 of 2012 dated 10th January, 2012, Respondent No. 2 invited applications for filling up various faculty positions of Professor and Assistant Professor, including four posts of Assistant Professor in Clinical Pharmacology, under Direct Recruitment at SKIMS, on regular/temporary basis. The further stand of the petitioner is that out of the four posts advertised in terms of the advertisement notice dated 10th January, 2012, the respondents filled up two posts of Assistant Professors in Clinical Pharmacology and two posts remained unfilled.
6. Further case of the petitioner is that while the process of filling the two posts was under consideration, Respondent No. 2 issued Government Order No. 74- SKIMS of 2013 dated 16th September, 2013, where under, the recruitment rules for filling up of the faculty positions in the Department of Clinical Pharmacology at SKIMS was notified,
Dinesh Kumar Kashyap & Ors vs South East Central Railway & Ors
East Coast Railway & Anr. V. Mahadev Appa Rao & Ors. reported as (2010) 7 SCC 678
K.Manjusree Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh& Anr. reported as (2008) 3 SCC 512
Hemani Malhotra v. High Court of Delhi [(2008) 7 SCC 11 : (2008) 2 SCC (L&S) 203
Madan Mohan Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported as AIR 2008 SC 1657
Ramesh Kumar Vs. High Court of Delhi & Anr. reported as (2010) 3 SCC 104
Shankarsan Dash vs Union of India reported as AIR 1991 SC 1612
Selection processes must adhere to previously established criteria, and unilateral changes are impermissible once the process has commenced.
Selected candidates do not have an indefeasible right to appointment; the state may issue new advertisements and change qualifications without legal obligation to fill prior vacancies.
The Court emphasized the obligation of the authority to appoint the next selected candidate in case of a vacancy and deemed the inclusion of the vacancy in the subsequent advertisement as illegal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the selection process must adhere to the terms of the advertisement and the prescribed rules, and any deviation from these norms is impermissi....
The court ruled that the selection process for Junior Assistant posts did not violate constitutional rights, emphasizing the need for accuracy in recruitment advertisements.
The court established that the application of reservation in recruitment must adhere to prescribed procedures set by the State Government, and any deviation from this framework renders the recruitmen....
Unsuccessful selection candidates estopped from challenging process; public institutions must declare all selection outcomes transparently before re-advertising to prevent suspicion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.