WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Mushtaq Ahmad S/o Late Abdul Salam Hakim – Appellant
Versus
SKIMS Soura, Srinagar, through Chairman Governing Body – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BRIEF FACTS:
1. The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner, in which he has called in question the impugned Advertisement Notice No. 02 of 2021 dated 17th April, 2021, besides called in question the order of Consideration bearing no. SIMS 130(P) of 2022 dated 30.07.2022 issued by Respondent No. 2. The petitioner has also sought a Writ in the nature of mandamus, seeking a direction against the respondents to select and appoint the petitioner against the post of Assistant Professor in Clinical Pharmacology, from amongst the Non-Medical Candidates by giving the benefit of such appointment from the date the same has been given to the Respondent No.3.
2. The instant petition came to be listed before this Court on 6th December 2022, in terms whereof this Court after feeling prima facie satisfied, restrained the official respondents from finalizing the selection to the post of Assistant Professor, Clinical Pharmacology.
3. Before indicating the grounds of challenge against impugned advertisement notice, it would be apt to refer to the brief factual background of
Dinesh Kumar Kashyap & Ors vs South East Central Railway & Ors
East Coast Railway & Anr. V. Mahadev Appa Rao & Ors. reported as (2010) 7 SCC 678
K.Manjusree Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh& Anr. reported as (2008) 3 SCC 512
Hemani Malhotra v. High Court of Delhi [(2008) 7 SCC 11 : (2008) 2 SCC (L&S) 203
Madan Mohan Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported as AIR 2008 SC 1657
Ramesh Kumar Vs. High Court of Delhi & Anr. reported as (2010) 3 SCC 104
Shankarsan Dash vs Union of India reported as AIR 1991 SC 1612
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.