RAJNESH OSWAL, RAHUL BHARTI
Afshana Anjum Baba D/o Mubarak Ahmad Baba – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. height requirements and gender equality in public employment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of applicable rules and prior requirements. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. candidate preparation and selection process overview. (Para 20 , 25 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. arguments for and against gender-neutral requirements. (Para 40 , 41 , 123) |
| 5. court findings on height requirement's legality and women's rights. (Para 162 , 165 , 167) |
JUDGMENT :
RAHUL BHARTI, J.
WP (C) No. 1757/2021
1. An upfront issue, in its legal connotation, in the case is that though body height of persons is a homogeneous dimension but can an agender homogeneity, equalizing male and female, be prescribed and applied in a selection process with respect to public employment to proclaim that it amounts to equality of height prescription under article 14 of the Constitution of India purporting no discrimination, directly or indirectly, against female candidates.
2. Mount Everest, standing at the height of 29030 ft. with a claim of being the highest point on Earth, succumbed to ascent by 6 ft. tall Sir Edmund
Arun Tewari vs. Zila Mansavi Shikshak Singh
Amrit Lal Berry vs. Collector of Central Excise
Air Commodore Naveen Jain vs. Union of India
Balco Employees Union vs. Union of India
Brajendra Singh Yambem vs. Union of India and Others
Chief Manager Punjab National Bank vs. Anit Kumar Das
Chandra Prakash Tiwari vs. Shakuntala Shukla
Chandigarh Administration vs. Jasmine Kaur
D.S. Nakara vs. Union of India
District Collector vs. M. Tripura Sundari Devi
Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai vs. State of Bihar and Others
Directorate of Film Festivals vs. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Others
Federation of Railway Officers Association and Others vs. Union of India
Firdousa Ahmed vs. State of J&K
Islamic Academy of Education and Another vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Joseph Shine vs. Union of India
Karnataka Bank Ltd. vs. State of A.P. (2008) 2 SCC 254
Krushna Chandra Sahu vs. State of Orissa
K.H. Siraj vs. High Court of Kerala and Others
Lt. Col. Nitisha and Others vs. Union of India and Others
Madan Lal vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Manish Kumar Shahi vs. State of Bihar
P.U. Joshi vs. Accountant General
Pradeep Kumar Roy vs. Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Ramesh Chandra Shah vs. Anil Joshi
State of West Bengal vs. Subhas Kumar Chatterjee and Others
State of Maharashtra and Others vs. Ravdeep Singh Sohal
State of Tripura vs. Subash Chandra (2017) 5 SCC 163
Zonal Manager, Bank of India vs. Aarya K. Babu
Zahoor Ahmad Rather and Others vs. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad and Others
Reservation for women candidates is horizontal, while social reservation is vertical. Horizontal reservation cuts across the vertical reservation by applying interlocking reservation system. The arra....
Height requirements for promotions must be consistent and not arbitrary, ensuring equal opportunity for candidates from different regions.
Candidates securing higher marks than unreserved category cannot claim reservation benefits unless explicitly provided by state policy; constitutional provisions require formal policy to confer reser....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.