SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 742

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
SANJEEV KUMAR, WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JJ.
Mushtaq Ahmad Paul and Others – Petitioners
Versus
UT of J&K and Others – Respondents
WP (C) No. 1591 of 2020
Decided On : 16-11-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shuja-ul-Haq.
For the Respondents: D.C. Raina, Sheikh Mushtaq.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that the failure to comply with the procedural requirements of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, particularly regarding the timely passing of awards and the payment of compensation, can lead to the lapse of acquisition proceedings, even when urgency provisions are invoked.

Headnote:

LAND ACQUISITION - Compensation and Procedure - J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990, Sections 4, 6, 11, 11-B, 17, 17-A; Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - The court analyzed the provisions of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990, particularly Sections 11-B and 17, which govern the timelines and procedures for land acquisition. It interpreted Section 11-B as mandating that if an award is not made within two years of the declaration under Section 6, the acquisition proceedings lapse. The court also examined Section 17, which allows for urgent acquisition, and Section 17-A, which requires the payment of 80% of the estimated compensation before taking possession. The court concluded that the failure to comply with Section 17-A meant that the land did not vest in the government, thus triggering the lapse of the acquisition proceedings under Section 11-B.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, residents of village Daharmunah, challenged the approval of compensation rates for land acquisition for a Semi Ring Road project, arguing that the acquisition proceedings initiated in 2017 had lapsed due to the failure to pass a final award within the two-year period mandated by Section 11-B of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the acquisition proceedings had indeed lapsed because the final award was passed after the two-year period specified in Section 11-B. It determined that the government had not complied with the requirements of Section 17-A, which necessitates the payment of 80% of the estimated compensation before taking possession of the land.

Issues: 'Whether the acquisition proceedings lapsed due to the failure to make an award within two years as per Section 11-B of the 1990 Act?', 'Does Section 11-B apply when the government invokes special powers under Section 17 for urgent acquisition?', 'What is the impact of the repeal of the 1990 Act and the introduction of the 2013 Act on ongoing acquisition proceedings?', 'What are the rights of land losers who challenge the acquisition proceedings after the final award has been passed?'

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 11-B of the 1990 Act applies to the case, leading to the lapse of acquisition proceedings due to the failure to pass a final award within the stipulated time. It clarified that the invocation of Section 17 does not exempt the government from complying with Section 17-A, which is crucial for the legal vesting of land in the government.

Final Decision: The court set aside the final award passed on 11th August 2020 and directed the Collector to pass a fresh award for the petitioners, applying the compensation assessment criteria under the 1990 Act, while considering the date of the final award as the relevant date for determining market value.

JUDGMENT :

SANJEEV KUMAR, J.

1. The petitioners claim to be residents of village Daharmunah, Budgam and are aggrieved of the communication of the Financial Commissioner, Revenue, bearing no. FC-LS/LA-4577/2017, dated 13.08.2020 whereby the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir has been conveyed the approval of the competent authority to the adoption of rates of compensation in respect of different villages in District Budgam for construction of Semi Ring Road around Srinagar City. The petitioners also claim Writ of Mandamus to the respondents to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings in respect of the land measuring 30 Kanals situated in Village Daharmunah, Budgam, strictly as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 [“2013 Act”].

2. The case of the petitioners as put up in this writ petition is that the acquisition proceedings initiated in terms of Notification dated 26.08.2017 issued under Section 4 of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990 [“1990 Act”] have lapsed by afflux of time in view of the provisions contained in Section 11(B) of the 1990 Act. The petitioners say and submit that in the year 2017, the respondent no. 5 initiated process of acquisition of land in their village and, accordingly, issued Notification under Section 4 of the 1990 Act vide its Notification No. DCB/LAS/016/F-330/2535-42, dated 26.08.2017 which was subsequently followed by Notifications under Section 6 and 7 of the 1990 Act. The Notifications were in respect of land measuring 316 Kanals and 23 sqfts. situated in village Daharmunah. It is the grievance of the petitioners that though their land was sought to be acquired in the year 2017 and Notification under Section 6 was issued on 22.12.2017, no further steps were taken to assess the compensation and pass final award within the stipulated period. It is the specific averment made by the petitioners that the respondents neither adopted the mode of private negotiation for adoption of rates nor did they follow the law of acquisition while acquiring the land of the petitioners and others similarly situated with the petitioners for constructing the Semi Ring Road. The petitioners submit that as mandated by the provisions of Section 11(B) of the 1990 Act, a final award is required to be passed within two years from the date, Notification under Section 6 is issued. The respondents, it is contended, have failed to fulfill the mandate of Section 11(B) and as a consequence whereof the acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents have lapsed by afflux of time.

3. On being put on notice, the respondents have filed their reply affidavits in which the respondents besides taking couple of preliminary objections to the maintainability of the writ petition, have contested the case of the petitioners on merits as well. It is submitted by the respondents that in the year 2016, the Project Director, PIU, Srinagar, National Highway Authority of India (NHIA) vide its communication dated 20.04.2016 placed an indent for acquiring land for construction of Semi Ring Road around Srinagar City. The land was to be acquired in forty five (45) villages of District Budgam including the village of the petitioners. The process of acquisition of land was set in motion by respondent no. 5 vide his Notification dated 26.08.2017 issued under Section 4 of the 1990 Act. This Notification was for acquiring land measuring 316 Kanals and 23 sqfts. The Notification was given due publicity through Directorate of Information and was also circulated through concerned Tehsildars for information of the land owners. The Government vide Notification No. 470-Rev(LAK) of 2017, dated 22.12.2017 issued declaration under Sections 6 and 7 of the 1990 Act which was followed by a Notification issued under Section 9 and 9A of the said Act. The objections were received from the interested persons from time to time and the same were given due consideration the detail whereof is given

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon Back to top