SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(J&K) 37

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
M A CHOWDHARY, J.
Sansar Chand, S/o Anant Ram - Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir through Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. Revenue Department – Respondent 
WP(C) No. 839 of 2022, CM No. 2528 of 2022 
Decided On : 08-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nadeem Bhat, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG

Final award beyond two-year limit from Section 6 declaration under J&K Land Acquisition Act lapses proceedings; court moulds relief by quashing award qua petitioners only and directing fresh award using original award date for compensation.

Headnote:(A) J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990 - Sections 4(1), 6, 7, 9, 9-A, 11, 11-B - Land acquisition proceedings for public road - Declaration under Section 6 issued, but final award passed beyond two-year period prescribed by Section 11-B - Entire proceedings lapse by operation of law if no stay or urgency conditions met - Award declared nullity qua petitioners; fresh award directed solely for their land using original award date as relevant date for market value, with statutory benefits including interest from possession date - Prior payments adjusted; no precedent for other landowners. (Paras 10-21)

(B) Where acquisition affects multiple owners and only some challenge delay, court moulds relief to avoid re-initiating full proceedings detrimental to public interest and project progress, guided by Supreme Court on urgency possession and partial compensation scenarios. (Paras 18-20)

Facts of the case:
Proceedings initiated for acquiring land measuring 45 kanals 7 marlas for road construction; Section 4(1) notification dated 07.03.2017; declaration under Sections 6 & 7 dated 16.08.2017; notifications under Sections 9, 9-A dated 23.08.2017; final award dated 03.07.2020 beyond two years, with compensation disbursed post-award; petitioners assailed on violation of Section 11-B, restricting to this ground.

Findings of Court:
Impugned final award quashed to extent of petitioners; Collector directed to pass fresh award for their property determining compensation as on 03.07.2020 with other benefits from possession date; date of fresh award as cause for reference if dissatisfied; no ripple effect on others.

Issues: Whether final award beyond two years from Section 6 declaration lapses proceedings under Section 11-B; appropriate relief where delay unchallenged by most owners but public purpose advanced.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 11-B imposes strict two-year limit for award from Section 6 declaration, excluding stayed periods; lapse automatic absent fulfilment of urgency payment and possession pre-lapse; relief moulded to quash partially and recompute for challengers only, balancing individual rights and public interest per binding precedents.

Result: Writ petition allowed with specified directions.

Table of Content
1. petition challenges land acquisition for procedural violations including delayed award under section 11-b. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents assert compliance with acquisition process and full compensation disbursement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. parties argue solely on award delay violating statutory two-year limit. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court identifies core issue of section 11-b time limit for award. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. section 11-b mandates award within two years from declaration or proceedings lapse. (Para 11 , 12)
6. delayed award renders acquisition proceedings lapsed and nullity. (Para 13 , 14)
7. precedents confirm lapse absent stay or urgency with 80% payment; no exception here. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
8. quash award for petitioners only; direct fresh award with statutory benefits. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

M A CHOWDHARY, J.

1. The petitioners, through the medium of this petition, inter alia, have prayed for the following reliefs:

(i) Writ of certiorari:- Quashing the final award bearing No.SDM/G/PWD/1475-81 dated 03.07.2020 passed by the respondent No.3 of the land acquired for the construction of Sangaldan Kanthan road in Village Movalkote under NABARD and quashing the Notification u/s 4(1) No.SDM/G/PWD/270-80 dated 07.03.2017 and 9, 9-A of J&K Land Acquisition Act 1990 and Notification No.6 and 7 of land J&K Acquisition Act bearing no. DC/LA/RBN/17/46-47 dated 15.06.2017;

(ii) Writ of Certiorari:- Quashing the land acquisition proceedings conducted by the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 of the land measuring 45 kanal 7 marlas situated at Village Movolkote Tehsil Gool District Ramban for the construction of road from Sangaldan to Kanthan under PWD being against the Section 11-B & Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act;

(iii) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings of the land measuring 45 kanals 7 marlas situated at Village Movalkote Tehsil Gool District Ramban which has been acquired for construction of road from Sangaldan- Kanthan road for public purpose because the final award has been passed in violation of Section 11-B of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990;

(iv) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents to initiate the fresh acquisition under Right to Fair Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2013 and pay the compensation to the petitioners with interest as per the Fair Compensation Act; and (v) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to pay the compensation of Fruit bearing and non fruit bearing trees assessed by the authorities in the year 2013 dated 07.01.2013 and 24.01.2013.

(vi) To pass such other orders or directions which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of case.”

2. Factual background as pleaded is that:-

(I) The government of J&K decided to construct a road from Sangaldan-Kanthan Bye pass through Village Movalkote, Tehsil Gool, District Ramban over the private land, houses and shops owned and possessed by different persons including the petitioners and for this purpose, land was acquired by the respondents 2 and 3 under the Land Acquisition Act but without paying any compensation to the petitioners; that aggrieved thereof, the petitioners approached this court in the year 2011 as also in 2014 by way of filing writ petitions, which were disposed of with direction to the respondents to assess the land of the petitioners and pay compensation accordingly;

(II) That respondents 3 and 4 in the year 2012 initiated the acquisition proceedings and Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was issued on 09.10.2012 but final award was not passed within the stipulated time period; that again in the year 2017, notification U/S 4(1) of the Act was issued but the final award was not passed within a period of two years as required U/S 11-B of the Act and the same was passed on 03.07.2020 i.e. after the lapse of more than two years; that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top