HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
M A CHOWDHARY, J.
Sansar Chand, S/o Anant Ram - Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir through Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. Revenue Department – Respondent
WP(C) No. 839 of 2022, CM No. 2528 of 2022
Decided On : 08-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges land acquisition for procedural violations including delayed award under section 11-b. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents assert compliance with acquisition process and full compensation disbursement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. parties argue solely on award delay violating statutory two-year limit. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court identifies core issue of section 11-b time limit for award. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. section 11-b mandates award within two years from declaration or proceedings lapse. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. delayed award renders acquisition proceedings lapsed and nullity. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. precedents confirm lapse absent stay or urgency with 80% payment; no exception here. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. quash award for petitioners only; direct fresh award with statutory benefits. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
M A CHOWDHARY, J.
1. The petitioners, through the medium of this petition, inter alia, have prayed for the following reliefs:
(i) Writ of certiorari:- Quashing the final award bearing No.SDM/G/PWD/1475-81 dated 03.07.2020 passed by the respondent No.3 of the land acquired for the construction of Sangaldan Kanthan road in Village Movalkote under NABARD and quashing the Notification u/s 4(1) No.SDM/G/PWD/270-80 dated 07.03.2017 and 9, 9-A of J&K Land Acquisition Act 1990 and Notification No.6 and 7 of land J&K Acquisition Act bearing no. DC/LA/RBN/17/46-47 dated 15.06.2017;
(ii) Writ of Certiorari:- Quashing the land acquisition proceedings conducted by the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 of the land measuring 45 kanal 7 marlas situated at Village Movolkote Tehsil Gool District Ramban for the construction of road from Sangaldan to Kanthan under PWD being against the Section 11-B & Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act;
(iii) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings of the land measuring 45 kanals 7 marlas situated at Village Movalkote Tehsil Gool District Ramban which has been acquired for construction of road from Sangaldan- Kanthan road for public purpose because the final award has been passed in violation of Section 11-B of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990;
(iv) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents to initiate the fresh acquisition under Right to Fair Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2013 and pay the compensation to the petitioners with interest as per the Fair Compensation Act; and (v) Writ of Mandamus:- Commanding the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to pay the compensation of Fruit bearing and non fruit bearing trees assessed by the authorities in the year 2013 dated 07.01.2013 and 24.01.2013.
(vi) To pass such other orders or directions which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of case.”
2. Factual background as pleaded is that:-
(I) The government of J&K decided to construct a road from Sangaldan-Kanthan Bye pass through Village Movalkote, Tehsil Gool, District Ramban over the private land, houses and shops owned and possessed by different persons including the petitioners and for this purpose, land was acquired by the respondents 2 and 3 under the Land Acquisition Act but without paying any compensation to the petitioners; that aggrieved thereof, the petitioners approached this court in the year 2011 as also in 2014 by way of filing writ petitions, which were disposed of with direction to the respondents to assess the land of the petitioners and pay compensation accordingly;
(II) That respondents 3 and 4 in the year 2012 initiated the acquisition proceedings and Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was issued on 09.10.2012 but final award was not passed within the stipulated time period; that again in the year 2017, notification U/S 4(1) of the Act was issued but the final award was not passed within a period of two years as required U/S 11-B of the Act and the same was passed on 03.07.2020 i.e. after the lapse of more than two years; that the
Final award beyond two-year limit from Section 6 declaration under J&K Land Acquisition Act lapses proceedings; court moulds relief by quashing award qua petitioners only and directing fresh award us....
The provisions of Section 11-B of the 1990 Act shall not be applicable to the cases where the Government has invoked Section 17 and the Collector has scrupulously complied with the requirements of Se....
The court established that the failure to comply with the procedural requirements of the J&K Land Acquisition Act, particularly regarding the timely passing of awards and the payment of compensation,....
The key legal principle established in the judgment is that the award must be made within a period of two years from the date of the publication of the declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisi....
Section 25 of LARR Act reads as Period within which an award shall be made –The Collector shall make an award within a period of twelve months from the date of publication of the declaration under se....
Section 11A of Act, Collector has to make an award under Section 11 within a period of two years from date of publication of declaration and if no award is made within that period, entire proceedings....
The court held that land acquisition proceedings lapsed as the award was not made within two years, violating statutory provisions and infringing constitutional rights.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.