SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(J&K) 34

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, J.
Pushpa Devi and others -Petitioners
Versus 
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, through Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Govt. – Respondent 
WP(C) No.554 of 2021
Decided On : 16-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondent:Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA with Mr. Divyanshu Malhotra, Advocate
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.K.S.Thakur, Advocate & Ms. Nandita Thakur, Advocate

State as welfare entity cannot claim adverse possession over private property; must acquire with compensation or return possession. Delay and laches rejected for continuing deprivation without due process.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 300A - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct return of possession of subject land or its acquisition with compensation - Petitioners are recorded owners who permitted temporary use for vehicle parking on assurance of acquisition if required permanently - Respondents in possession since 1968-69 without acquisition or payment, claiming adverse possession and delay - Ownership admitted and reflected in revenue records - No deprivation of property without authority of law - State as welfare state cannot plead adverse possession to perfect title over citizens' land - Plea of delay and laches rejected as continuing cause of action shocking judicial conscience - Respondents directed to acquire land or return possession within six months. (Paras 1,7-18)

(B) Adverse Possession - Doctrine inapplicable to State; welfare state cannot gain title by possession akin to trespasser - Plea untenable as it undermines constitutional rights and public trust. (Paras 9-13)

(C) Delay and Laches - Not rigid rule; inapplicable to continuing wrongs involving property deprivation without due process - Constitutional jurisdiction exercised to promote justice despite delay. (Paras 14-16)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners inherited subject land shown as owned and possessed in revenue records. Respondents permitted temporary use for parking vehicles with assurance of lawful acquisition if permanent need arose. Respondents developed alternative parking facility but continued occupation without acquisition or compensation, operating road, auto stand and recreational area thereon. Petitioners repeatedly sought vacation or acquisition without success.

Findings of Court:
Respondents to initiate acquisition process forthwith under prevailing law, conclude within six months from service of judgment and pay compensation; alternatively, return possession if land no longer required.

Issues: Whether respondents' long possession confers adverse title; whether delay bars relief; obligation to either acquire land lawfully or restore to owners.

Ratio Decidendi: Property rights protected under Article 300A require deprivation only by authority of law; State barred from adverse possession against citizens; delay immaterial in continuing property dispossession without legal sanction, warranting mandamus for acquisition or vacation.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners inherited land; temporary use permitted for parking. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. respondents in continuous possession since 1968 for public use. (Para 6)
3. petitioners claim due process; respondents plead delay, adverse possession. (Para 7 , 8)
4. ownership admitted; no acquisition or compensation paid. (Para 9 , 10)
5. property protected under article 300a; due process required. (Para 11)
6. state cannot claim adverse possession against citizens. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
7. delay and laches rejected in continuing property wrongs. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, J.

1. The petitioners in the instant petition have invoked extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court, vested under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to seek a writ of mandamus thereby directing the respondents to handover the possession of the land measuring 5 kanal 4 marlas comprising in Khasra No.436/268 (3 marlas), Khasra No.437/268 2 kanal 10 marlas), Khasra No.438/249 (11 marlas), Khasra No.439/269 (12 marlas), Khasra No.440/269 (1 kanal 6 marlas) and Khasra No.435/268 (12 marlas) situated at Katra (hereinafter to be referred to as “subject land”) or in the alternate to acquire the said land under the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and pay compensation therefor.

Factual Matrix

2. It is stated that the petitioners have inherited the subject land from their predecessors-in-interest, who were the recorded owners in possession, which is so reflected in the revenue record including Jamabandi for the year 1997-98 svt. Vide SRO 112 dated 07.03.1963, Notified Area Committee, Katra was constituted and the landed property of the then village Katra fell within the boundaries of the Notified Area Committee, Katra.

3. For temporary use of parking of vehicles in Katra town the respondents required some land, a portion of the land including the subject land, was selected for the temporary parking of vehicles and with the permission of predecessors-in-interest of the petitioners, the respondents started using the subject land along with other land as parking space. According to the petitioners, the respondents were allowed to use the subject land temporary for parking of vehicles on the assurance that in case the same would be required permanently, the respondents would acquire the same in accordance with law and pay compensation for the same.

4. With the enactment of Municipal Act of 2000, J&K Municipal Act. Svt. 2008 and Notified Area Act Svt. 2011 have been repealed and the Notified Area Committee, Katra has been renamed as Municipal Committee, Katra.

5. It is stated that the respondents have acquired land measuring 464 kanals under different khasra numbers at village Kundrorian, outside the municipal limits for construction of bus stand/parking place, which is almost complete, as such, the subject land would no longer be required by the respondents. It is stated that the petitioners have approached the concerned officers number of times for handing over the possession of the subject land to them or to acquire the same after payment of compensation, but till date neither the subject land has been vacated nor has it been acquired. It is further stated that the respondents had taken possession of the subject land without payment of any compensation and that they cannot be allowed to use the subject land for indefinite period.

4. On the contrary, the respondents have resisted the claim of the petitioners by filing their objections. It is stated that the subject land has been under continuous possession of the Municipal Committee, Katra since 1968- 1969 till date without any hindrance and resistance from any quarter. It is further stated that there exists a public road, besides an auto stand also operates and is being run by the auto union from the subject land. According to the respondents, some portion of the land lying open and is being us

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top