SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(J&K) 258

SANJEEV KUMAR
Ghar Singh – Appellant
Versus
University of Jammu, Jammu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Gourav Goswami
For the Respondent: Ajay Abrol

JUDGEMENT

1. A short grievance projected by the petitioner in this petition is that, though, services of the petitioner were regularized vide order dated 25th March, 2010 with immediate effect, yet in terms of the provisions of SRO 64 of 1994 adopted by the University of Jammu, he was entitled to be regularized immediately after the completion of seven years of service.

2. Briefly stated, the facts leadings to the filing of this petition are that the petitioner came to be engaged as Casual Labourer on 7th July, 1997 and was posted as Security Guard against an available vacant post. The petitioner continued in service for long but was not regularized. The petitioner claims to have represented before the authorities time and again, but there was no positive response from the University authorities. The further case of the petitioner is that he along with thirteen others came to be regularized vide order dated 25th March, 2010. Insofar as the petitioner is concerned, his services were regularized as Security Guard and he was placed in the regular pay scale with immediate effect. The petitioner claims that he represented against his regularization with prospective effect and claimed that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top