HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
SANJAY DHAR, J.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Sameer Hussain Rather & Ors. - Respondent
Mac Appeal No. 45 of 2019
Decided on : 07-06-2024
JUDGEMENT
1. The appellant Insurance Company has challenged award dated 12.03.2019 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Srinagar (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal"), whereby compensation in the amount of Rs. 20,54,251/- along with interest @ 6.5% per annum has been awarded in favour of respondents No. 1 to 3 (hereinafter referred to as "the claimants") and the appellant has been burdened with the liability to satisfy the said award.
2. The claim petition has arisen out of a road traffic accident that took place on 07.09.2012, as a result of which one Ghulam Hassan Rather, who happened to be the father of respondents No. 1 and 2 and husband of respondent No. 3, suffered fatal injuries. In the claim petition, it was alleged that the deceased was travelling in a vehicle bearing No. JK01F-4924 that was being driven rashly and negligently by its driver, respondent No. 4 herein, as a result of which the vehicle met with an accident upon reaching Wushoo on Wagam-Chadoora Road. It was submitted by the claimants that the deceased was aged 52 years and he was working as a Beldar in Radio Kashmir, Srinagar, drawing a monthly salary of Rs. 30,000/-. The claimants sought compensation in the amount of Rs. 30.00 lacs along with interest @ 12% per annum.
3. The claim petition was resisted by the appellant Insurance Company as well as by respondents No. 4 and 5, the driver and owner of the offending vehicle. The appellant Insurance Company in its reply admitted the currency of policy of insurance of the offending vehicle on the date of the occurrence. It was, however, claimed that owner of the offending vehicle had committed breach of the policy conditions, inasmuch as driver of the offending vehicle was not holding a valid driving licence nor the documents of the vehicle were valid. The owner and driver of the offending vehicle viz. respondents No. 4 and 5, while denying the occurrence, claimed that the compensation sought by the claimants is highly excessive.
4. In terms of order dated 21.12.2012, the Tribunal, on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, framed the following issues:
2. Whether the respondent driver of the offending vehicle Tata 407 was permitted by the respondent owner to drive the offending vehicle without holding a valid and effective D/L on the material date of accident and the other documents like R/P, F/C, R/C and I/C, etc. if yes, the insured has committed breach of policy stipulations which absolves the respondent-insurance company from its liability? (OPR-3)
3. Whether the claim petition is not maintainable in the present form as the Hon'ble Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to try and hear the matter? (OPR-3)
4. Whether the petitioners are entitled to any compensation, from whom and to what extent? (OPP)
5. Relief?
5. After recording evidence of the parties, the Tribunal held that the accident was caused due to rashness and negligence on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle which resulted in death of the deceased. It was also held that the appellant-insurance company has failed to prove that there was any breach of the policy conditions. Accordingly, compensation in the amount of Rs. 20,54,251/- along with interest @ 6.5% per annum was awarded in favour of the claimants by taking monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 25,379/- with future prospects of Rs. 3807/- per month.
6. The appellant-insurance company has challenged the impugned award on several grounds but during the course of arguments, much emphasis has been laid on the followin
Insurance companies must prove policy breaches to avoid liability; interest on future prospects in compensation claims is impermissible.
The court affirmed the validity of the driver's license and ruled that the Insurance Company failed to prove negligence, thus holding it liable for compensation.
Insurance company is not liable for compensation when driver lacks valid endorsement for hazardous goods transport, reversing Claims Tribunal's decision.
A learner's license does not preclude insurance liability if the driver is accompanied by a licensed instructor, and the insurer must prove policy violations to avoid liability.
The court ruled that the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation first, despite the driver's invalid license, and established guidelines for calculating future prospects and multipliers in co....
The court upheld the Tribunal's finding of negligence against the truck driver and affirmed the compensation amount, emphasizing the necessity of just compensation for dependents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.