ANOOP CHITKARA
Shashi Shekhar Alias Tinu – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 300 | 25.09.2021 | Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala | 148/149/307/323/324/506 IPC |
1. The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on a compromise with the aggrieved person.
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the aggrieved person has been impleaded as respondent.
4. On 31-03-2022, the aggrieved person Rahul (R-2) stated before the Ld. JMIC Ambala that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 01-04-2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat or coercion.
ANALYSIS & REASONING:
5. The State's counsel has severely op
DimpeyGujraj v Union Territory
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab
Gulab Das and Ors. V. State of M. P.
Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab
ParbatbhaiAahir v State of Gujarat
State of M.P. vs. Rajveer Singh
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Dhruv Gurjar
State of Maharashtra vs. Vikram Anantrai Doshi
State of Rajasthan vs. Shambhu Kewat
Suresh Babu vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.