ANOOP CHITKARA
Gurdawar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara J. - The petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on a compromise with the aggrieved person.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 90 | 17.07.2017 | Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran | 323, 324, 326, 341, 307, 148, 149, IPC and 25,27, 54, 59 Arms act |
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the aggrieved person has been impleaded as respondent.
4. On 23-11-2020, the aggrieved persons Sarabjit Singh (R-2), Dilbagh Singh (R-3), and Harpal Singh (R-4) appeared before the Ld. SDJM Khadur Sahib that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 01.12-2020, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequ
DimpeyGujraj v Union Territory
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab
ParbatbhaiAahir v State of Gujarat
State of M.P. v. Rajveer Singh
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar
State of Maharashtra vs. Vikram Anantrai Doshi
State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat
Suresh Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.