Nuzhat Jahan vs State of Jharkhand - 2022 Supreme(Jhk) 437

Breaking News

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 437

DEEPAK ROSHAN
Nuzhat Jahan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Saman Ahmad.
For the Respondents: V.S. Sahay, A. Allam.

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant application has been preferred challenging the propriety and correctness of the order dated 03.05.2006, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi, in Maintenance Case No. 56 of 2004; whereby the learned Family Court, Ranchi has held that the petitioner No. 1-(wife of O.P. No. 2) is not entitled to any maintenance allowance on the ground that she has already been divorced by the O.P. No. 2 and petitioner No. 2 (child of O.P. No. 2) is only entitled to monthly allowance of Rs. 600/- per month from June, 2004; that too is very inadequate.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that the Nuzhat Jahan-petitioner No. 1 and Taiyab Ali-O.P. No. 2 were married on 02.04.2000 according to Muslim rites and customs. The petitioner No. 1 went to her sasural where she was subjected to cruelty for dowry demand of Rs. 2,00,000/- for purchasing of a Car. The petitioner No. 1 w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document