IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
Rajesh Kacchap and Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through Secretary, Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management and Others - Respondents
W.P.(Cr.) No. 483 of 2022
Decided On : 03-03-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 226, 227 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 419, 420, 124-A, 120-B, 34, 147, 148, 149, 436, 302 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 156, 177, 178, 179, 181 – Offence of murder – Writ petition has been filed by 3 sitting MLAs of Jharkhand Legislative Assembly – They have questioned registration of zero FIR by officer-in-charge of Argora PS at Ranchi on complaint of respondent no. 4 made and transmission thereof to Panchla PS within district of Howrah (Gramin) in State of West Bengal – Held, Court must indicate that these are facts recorded in affidavit of respondents and documents attached therewith and some arguments were made in this regard and that is reason Court have noted aforementioned facts – Court arrive at irresistible conclusion that complaints are further statements made under section 161 of Code of Criminal Procedure in connection to Kotwali PS Case and the incident reported by respondent no. 4 to officer-in-charge of Argora PS is distinctly in connection to and part of the same conspiracy suspected by him in year 2021 - vide Kotwali PS Case – Accordingly, Court hold that registration of zero FIR vide Argora PS Case is illegal, without jurisdiction and tantamounts to second FIR and, accordingly, Argora PS Case is quashed – Court further hold that transmission of Argora PS Case to officer-in-charge of Panchla PS within Howrah (Gramin) district in State of West Bengal is illegal, without authority of law and actuated with malice – Allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
This writ petition has been filed by 3 sitting MLAs of the Jharkhand Legislative Assembly. They have questioned registration of zero FIR by the officer-in-charge of Argora PS at Ranchi on the complaint of the respondent no. 4 made on 31st July 2022 and transmission thereof to Panchla PS within the district of Howrah (Gramin) in the State of West Bengal. The main plank of the petitioners is Kotwali PS Case No. 159 of 2021 which was also registered on the basis of a complaint made by the respondent no. 4 on 22nd July 2021 and is still pending investigation. According to the petitioners, the registration of zero FIR dated 31st July 2022 is illegal, without authority of law and tantamounts to second FIR corresponding to Kotwali PS Case No. 159 of 2021.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have made the following prayers:
and/or
(ii) issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing/set aside the Transfer of the Complaint/ZERO FIR dated 31.07.2022 being Panchla PS. Case No. 276/2022 dated 31.07.2022 (Annexure-1) u/s 420, 120B, 171(E), 34, 468, 471, 201 and 467 of the Penal Code, 1860 and sections 7, 11, 12, 8 and 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988;
and/or
(iii) issue or pass any writ, direction or order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. Briefly stated, on 22nd July 2021, the respondent no. 4 who is a sitting MLA from Bermo constituency in the State of Jharkhand provided information to the officer-in-charge of Kotwali PS at Ranchi that in furtherance of a conspiracy to topple the JMM-RJD-Congress coalition government some influential people and financers have arrived at Ranchi, they are staying in different hotels and are trying to allure MLAs. On the basis of his written complaint, Kotwali PS Case No. 159 of 2021 was registered on 22nd July 2021 under sections 419, 420, 124-A, 120-B read with section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860, sections 8 and 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and section 171-B of the Representation of the Peoples Act. On 30th July 2022, the respondent no. 4 gave a similar complaint to Argora PS again raising an apprehension that some political persons are trying to topple the government of the day. A sanha entry was made at 03 : 00 PM on 30th July 2022 in Argora PS at Ranchi in which the officer-in-charge of Argora PS has made a remark that he himself would make enquiry into the allegations in the said complaint.
4. The sanha entry dated 30th July 2022 which appears at serial no. 21 in the Station Diary has been made in the following words:
5. On 31st July 2022, the respondent no. 4 gave another complaint to Argora PS at Ranchi raising a similar apprehension and making allegations against the petitioners on the basis of which zero FIR under sections 420, 124-A, 120-B read with section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860, section 171-B of the Representation of the Peoples Act and section 8/9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act has been registered.
6. Before that, at about 05 : 05 PM on 30th July 2022 the officer-in-charge of Panchla PS had made General Diary Entry of the following information:
Gulam Mustafa v. State of Maharashtra
Krishna Lal Chawla v. State of U.P
Navinchandra N. Majithia v. State of Maharashtra
S. Swamirathnam v. State of Madras
State of A.P. v. Goverdhanlal Pitti
State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar
T.T. Anthony v. State of Kerala
Amitbhai Anilchandra Shah v. CBI : (2013) 6 SCC 348
Babulal Chaukhani v. King Emperor, (1937-38) 65 IA 158
Banwari Lal Jhunjhunwala v. Union of India
Century Spinning and Manufacturing Company Ltd. v. Ulhasnagar Municipal Council
The court emphasized that FIR registration is mandatory for cognizable offences, rejecting locus standi as a barrier to filing complaints.
Malicious prosecution claims must show prima facie cases are unfounded; mere political allegations do not suffice to quash FIRs without substantive evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of Section 154 CrPC, the concept of 'Zero FIR', and the obligation of the police to register a regular FIR on the disclosure o....
In the absence of any material indicating influence being thrust upon him at the instance of such superior officers, an order for transferring the investigation to another agency cannot be made.
Abuse of Process of Law - Multiple FIRs for Same Occurrence
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.